2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2019.106042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geological occurrence and accumulation mechanism of natural gas hydrates in the eastern Qiongdongnan Basin of the South China Sea: Insights from site GMGS5-W9-2018

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. N refers to the normalized concentration against the standard Post-Archaean Australian Shale [43].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…. N refers to the normalized concentration against the standard Post-Archaean Australian Shale [43].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…δ 13 C and gas composition analysis indicated that the identified hydrate-bound gases are a mixture of biogenic and thermogenic gas. The paleo-uplift resulted in the differential compaction and formation of fractures and faults, which ultimately controlled the development of gas hydrate [43]. An intermediate gas reservoir lies beneath 190 mbsf, which has been suggested to bridge the deep gas reservoir and shallow gas hydrate system [36].…”
Section: Geological Settings and Site Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deep‐water fans and channels are widely developed in this area. Seismic profiles show that a large number of gas chimneys and bottom simulating reflectors, indicators of gas migration and gas hydrate, were developed in the QDNB (Fang et al, ; Liang et al, ; Zhang et al, ). The fifth gas hydrate drilling expedition conducted in 2018 recovered natural gas hydrates within a gas chimney system (Wei, Liang, Lu, Zhang, & He, ; Ye et al, ).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of total carbon release, describing methane flow in mole values may lead to an underestimation since higher hydrocarbons are not considered, e.g., Mega Plumes 1 and 2 in [24]. However, because it was assumed that pure methane was released from the Site F and Haima cold seeps [57][58][59], the volume and gas amount (moles) were calculated separately for each bubble size measurement and then averaged for more accurate results. The estimated methane bubble flow rates for seeps 1-3 at Site F were 0.4, 4.4, and 0.1 L h -1 , respectively, and seep 1 of the Haima cold seeps yielded a rate of 12.6 L h -1 .…”
Section: Methane Bubble Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%