2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0928-8937(02)80015-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geological implications of a large pressure difference across a small fault in the Viking Graben

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Shale Gouge Ratio (SGR) method is the most widely used permeability predictor and has been applied in a number of published studies (Manzocchi et al 1999;Childs et al 2002;Rivenaes & Dart 2002: Sperrevik et al 2002. It is based on permeability constraints indicating a negative correlation between the phyllosilicate fraction within a fault rock and its permeability (Fig.…”
Section: Shale Gouge Ratio Permeability Predictormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Shale Gouge Ratio (SGR) method is the most widely used permeability predictor and has been applied in a number of published studies (Manzocchi et al 1999;Childs et al 2002;Rivenaes & Dart 2002: Sperrevik et al 2002. It is based on permeability constraints indicating a negative correlation between the phyllosilicate fraction within a fault rock and its permeability (Fig.…”
Section: Shale Gouge Ratio Permeability Predictormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9b. The precise nature of this relationship varies between studies (Childs et al 2002: Sperrevik et al 2002, a feature generally attributed to differences in factors such as the burial depth at the time of faulting and the maximum burial depth. Nevertheless the general perception is that SGR:permeability transformations should follow a negative correlation, perhaps even an approximately linear relationship on a plot of SGR against log-permeability.…”
Section: Shale Gouge Ratio Permeability Predictormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knai & Knipe 1998;Ottesen Ellesevet et al 1998;Manzocchi et al 1999;Childs et al 2002, Hollund et al 2002Rivenaes & Dart 2002;Yielding 2002;Jolley et al 2007;Myers et al 2007). These methods calculate multipliers for each fault connection in the model based on local estimates of fault rock permeability and thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manzocchi et al (1999) have noted, the fault rock permeability thus obtained should be regarded as a median value having an uncertainty range of two orders of magnitude, in Fig.3, the data points in the calibration are not plenty and they come from various formations and areas hence the large scatter of the data is seen. Nonetheless, the fault rock permeability thus calculated can be used (1) for comparing various parts of a fault surface, and (2) for proxy estimation of the transmissibility of faults (defined as fault rock permeability divided by fault zone thickness) in reservoir simulation (Manzocchi et al, 1999;Childs et al, 2002). In any case, the model permeability data should be ultimately checked against permeability data derived from other methods, either directly from fault-rock cores or indirectly from well logs if they hit the fault rocks.…”
Section: Fault Rock Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%