2007
DOI: 10.1134/s1028334x0703004x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geological history of the Late Precambrian Patom Supergroup (Central Siberia)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, coupled C and Sr isotopic data show a pattern of secular variation in the Dalnyaya Taiga and overlying successions that closely matches those of early to mid-Ediacaran rocks on other continents (Sovietov, 2002;Pokrovskii et al, 2006;Chumakov et al, 2007). This includes not only a negative C-isotopic anomaly in cap carbonates above the diamictite, but also a pronounced negative C-isotopic excursion in carbonates of the Zhuya Group that immediately overlie Dalnyaya Taiga strata, and a pattern of increasing 87 Sr/ 86 Taken at face value, then, C and Sr isotopes indicate that fossiliferous Ura shales were deposited in early but not earliest Ediacaran times, and predate most known Ediacaran macrofossil deposits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, coupled C and Sr isotopic data show a pattern of secular variation in the Dalnyaya Taiga and overlying successions that closely matches those of early to mid-Ediacaran rocks on other continents (Sovietov, 2002;Pokrovskii et al, 2006;Chumakov et al, 2007). This includes not only a negative C-isotopic anomaly in cap carbonates above the diamictite, but also a pronounced negative C-isotopic excursion in carbonates of the Zhuya Group that immediately overlie Dalnyaya Taiga strata, and a pattern of increasing 87 Sr/ 86 Taken at face value, then, C and Sr isotopes indicate that fossiliferous Ura shales were deposited in early but not earliest Ediacaran times, and predate most known Ediacaran macrofossil deposits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant changes in ε Nd (T) at the contact between the Barakun and Khomolkha stratigraphic horizons indicate a change of the geochemical type of the source of terrigenous material supplying in the paleobasin at that time. Strongly negative ε Nd (T) for the metasediments from the lower and middle parts of the sequence, as well as their old ages within 3.1-2.3 Ga suggest that (2) ba-3 (3) ba-6 (4) bg-3 (5) bg-8 (6) 78-12 (7) 44-15 (8) м-2 (9) 49-15 (10) br-3 (11) nk-2 (12) b-13/10 (13) (Goldstein, Jacobsen, 1988 (Chumakov et al, 2007). Age boundaries of stratigraphic complexes are shown after (Melezhik et al, 2009;Chumakov et al, 2011;Powerman et al, 2015).…”
Section: Obtained Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cycles, which correspond to the Ballaganach, Dal'nyaya Taiga, Zhuya, and Bodaibo groups. Three former groups are united into the Patom Complex, whereas the Bodaibo Group is ascribed to the Yudoma Complex (Chumakov et al, 2007;Nemerov et al, 2010;Chumakov et al, 2013 etc. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation and stratigraphic position of Neoproterozoic sedimentary and volcanosedimentary complexes, which are widespread along the southern periphery of the Siberian Platform, remain debatable for a long time (Semikhatov and Serebryakov, 1983;Ivanov et al, 1995;Chumakov et al, 2007;Stanevich et al, 2007). The Baikal-Patom region hosts the Baikal Complex, which is considered as a standard Siberian Upper Riphean (Baikalian) stratigraphic unit (Kho mentovskii et al, 1985;Khomentovskii, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%