Geological Heritage Management and Preservation Instruments: Case Study of the Municipality of Conceicao Da Aparecida, Minas Gerais Â€“ Brazil

OLIVEIRA, Gabriel Henrique de; Servidoni, Lucas Emanuel; Spalević, Velibor; GASPAR, Lineo Aparecido; Mincato, Ronaldo Luiz

doi:10.17707/agricultforest.67.3.06

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Various approaches are used for the purposes of effective geoheritage management. These were reviewed by Bratton et al [67], Cayla [68], de Oliveira et al [69], Erikstad [70], Fuertes-Gutiérrez et al [71], Lech et al [72], Lima et al [73], Mucivuna et al [74], Pál and Albert [75], Prosser et al [76], Reynard and Brilha [77], and Spyrou et al [78]. In regard to the state of three considered geoheritage points (see above) and the entire geoheritage of Mountainous Adygeya [26], five managerial actions can be recommended.…”

Section: Geoheritage Management Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Islands in the Caucasian Sea in Three Mesozoic Time Slices: Novel Dimension of Geoheritage and Geotourism

Ruban

2022

JMSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Framing geoheritage thematically is important to reveal its diversity. Field investigations in the western part of the Greater Caucasus orogen have allowed for the characterization of three localities representing palaeoislands of the Caucasian Sea, which evolved as a semi-enclosed, marginal palaeosea during the Mesozoic. The Gosh locality represents coarse siliciclastics formed on the cliffed shore of the early Induan (Early Triassic) island. The Lipovy locality exhibits conglomerates accumulated on the shore of the early Toarcian (Early Jurassic) island due to erosion of the uplifted crystalline rocks. The Shakhan locality boasts a representative section of cross-bedded sandstones deposited on the alluvial plain of the Hauterivian (Early Cretaceous) island. All these localities are interpreted as geoheritage points, which are parts of larger geosites. Taken together, these points constitute thematic geoheritage sites reflecting the existence of palaeoislands in all Mesozoic periods, which is essential for the understanding of the evolution of the Caucasian Sea during this era. These localities are perfectly accessible, but visiting them requires professional interpretation. The importance of the thematic geoheritage makes its adequate management urgent (particularly, maintenance of geoheritage points, the installation of interpretive panels, and promotion). A geoexcursion route is proposed to facilitate geotouristic exploitation of the characterized geoheritage sites.

show abstract

Section: Geoheritage Management Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Islands in the Caucasian Sea in Three Mesozoic Time Slices: Novel Dimension of Geoheritage and Geotourism

Ruban

2022

JMSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Geological Heritage Management and Preservation Instruments: Case Study of the Municipality of Conceicao Da Aparecida, Minas Gerais Â€“ Brazil

Cited by 1 publication

References 17 publications

Islands in the Caucasian Sea in Three Mesozoic Time Slices: Novel Dimension of Geoheritage and Geotourism

Islands in the Caucasian Sea in Three Mesozoic Time Slices: Novel Dimension of Geoheritage and Geotourism

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About