1985
DOI: 10.2172/5626671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geological, geochemical, and geophysical survey of the geothermal resources at Hot Springs Bay Valley, Akutan Island, Alaska

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) 230 • C, and likely exceeding 240 • C. If the sample from TG-2 (254 m) is only modestly contaminated by drilling fluid and reflects the dilution path, the projected temperature could be closer to 260 • C. Silica geothermometers, which tend to record more recently equilibrated fluid temperatures, yield temperatures of ∼170 • C for TG-2, agreeing with the spring chemistry interpretations of Motyka and Nye (1988) and Symonds et al (2003a,b), and with the maximum measured well discharge temperature of 182 • C. This is consistent with a higher temperature (>240 • C) source that is capable of producing an outflow aquifer with temperature >180 • C, consistent with the hot spring and borehole production cation and silica geothermometry (Table 4). Geothermometry estimates from HSBV fumarole gases consistently suggests reservoir temperatures of 270-300 • C, as shown, RH value (oxidation state) of −2.8 is typical for an equilibrated geothermal system associated with an andesitic stratovolcano (Giggenbach, 1991).…”
Section: Geothermometrysupporting
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) 230 • C, and likely exceeding 240 • C. If the sample from TG-2 (254 m) is only modestly contaminated by drilling fluid and reflects the dilution path, the projected temperature could be closer to 260 • C. Silica geothermometers, which tend to record more recently equilibrated fluid temperatures, yield temperatures of ∼170 • C for TG-2, agreeing with the spring chemistry interpretations of Motyka and Nye (1988) and Symonds et al (2003a,b), and with the maximum measured well discharge temperature of 182 • C. This is consistent with a higher temperature (>240 • C) source that is capable of producing an outflow aquifer with temperature >180 • C, consistent with the hot spring and borehole production cation and silica geothermometry (Table 4). Geothermometry estimates from HSBV fumarole gases consistently suggests reservoir temperatures of 270-300 • C, as shown, RH value (oxidation state) of −2.8 is typical for an equilibrated geothermal system associated with an andesitic stratovolcano (Giggenbach, 1991).…”
Section: Geothermometrysupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Published chemical data from hot springs, meteoric water and fumarole gases (Motyka and Nye, 1988;Motyka et al, 1993;Symonds et al, 2003a,b) were combined with data from three water samples collected during drilling: one from the productive zone in TG-2 at 178 m depth collected during drilling; one from the bottom of TG-2 (254 m depth); and one from TVD in TG-4 (500 m depth). Due to poor permeability in TG-4, the sample required an air-assist to bring well fluid samples to the surface.…”
Section: Fluid and Gas Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations