2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2018.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geological evidence of tsunamis in the past 3800 years at a coastal lowland in the Central Fukushima Prefecture, Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to discussing possible earthquake scenarios for prehistoric earthquakes, our spatio-temporal event stratigraphy for the area south of 39.0 • N reveals the most promising data from the deep subsurface of the basins JTS01, JTS15, and JTC07-JTC11. The 2.3 (+0.4/-0.2) ka event deposit identified in the basin JTS15 is probably related to the 2.4-2.6 ka earthquake that has been inferred from a tsunami deposit reported along the coast between the northern Fukushima and southern Miyagi Prefectures (e.g., Kusumoto et al, 2018). Yet, interpretation of an earthquake trigger for this event deposit may not be unique, because the correlation of the event deposit with a wide possible age range cannot be constrained by our basin-to-basin correlation.…”
Section: Southern and South-central Part Of The Japan Trenchmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…With respect to discussing possible earthquake scenarios for prehistoric earthquakes, our spatio-temporal event stratigraphy for the area south of 39.0 • N reveals the most promising data from the deep subsurface of the basins JTS01, JTS15, and JTC07-JTC11. The 2.3 (+0.4/-0.2) ka event deposit identified in the basin JTS15 is probably related to the 2.4-2.6 ka earthquake that has been inferred from a tsunami deposit reported along the coast between the northern Fukushima and southern Miyagi Prefectures (e.g., Kusumoto et al, 2018). Yet, interpretation of an earthquake trigger for this event deposit may not be unique, because the correlation of the event deposit with a wide possible age range cannot be constrained by our basin-to-basin correlation.…”
Section: Southern and South-central Part Of The Japan Trenchmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Hurricane and tsunami deposits mostly result from onshore transport of near-shore sediment and exhibit a number of similar characteristics (e.g., Morton et al, 2007). Many criteria have already been defined to distinguish tsunami from storm deposits (e.g., Goff et al, 2004 ;Morton et al, 2007 ;Engel et al, 2016 ;Kusumoto et al, 2018), however, these criteria are most of the time site-dependent. Among the 25 F3 deposits, two deposits display specific criteria which may contribute to their identification as tsunami records.…”
Section: Processes Involved In High Energy Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The confirmation of tsunami needs further studies on land, as the differentiation criteria (e.g. depositional thickness) were established based on the comparison of the modern typhoon and tsunami-induced deposits in the coastal lagoon and marsh (Kitamura et al, 2020; Kusumoto et al, 2018; Moreira et al, 2017; Morton et al, 2007). For the YJ core in the northern SCS (Figure 1b), there is also a reverse 14 C age in the core depths at 79 cm (2999 cal yr BP) and 99 cm (2750 cal yr BP) (Huang et al, 2018), which further indicates that the huge storm tides occurred in South China.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%