2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2015.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geological calibration of spallation production rates in the CRONUS-Earth project

Abstract: Models of the production of cosmogenic nuclides typically incorporate an adjustable production rate parameter that is scaled for variations in production with latitude and altitude. In practice, this production rate parameter is set by calibration of the model using cosmogenic nuclide data from sites with independent age constraints. In this paper, we describe a calibration procedure developed during the Cosmic-Ray Produced Nuclide Systematics on Earth (CRONUS-Earth) project and its application to an extensive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

29
544
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 562 publications
(575 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(54 reference statements)
29
544
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Be SLHL spallogenic production rate is statistically identical to those reported in (Borchers et al, 2016). We use the updated 10 Be half-life of 1.387 ± 0.012…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Be SLHL spallogenic production rate is statistically identical to those reported in (Borchers et al, 2016). We use the updated 10 Be half-life of 1.387 ± 0.012…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…and compute the production and decay/erosion of 10 Be and 26 Al throughout the Quaternary for different combinations of the model parameters, and compare the results to the measured concentrations between each simulation. We use a sea level high-latitude 10 Be production rate of 4.01 atoms g −1 per year and 26 Al production rate of 27.07 atoms g −1 per year, based on the calibration set by Borchers et al 39. for 10 Be and 26 Al surface production rates and the Lal (1991)/Stone (2000) scaling scheme4041 for all 49 samples from the three areas in west Greenland (see Supplementary Data 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al ages using the updated, globally averaged production rate with Lm scaling (originally reported by Borchers et al, 2016) Be ages have been determined for a single boulder (Benson et al, 2004;Brugger, 2007) Be age varies greatly sample-to-sample, but on average the 36 Cl ages are about 7.5% younger than the recalculated 10 Be ages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%