Reservoir Characterization 1986
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-434065-7.50009-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geologic Prediction of Shale Continuity Prudhoe Bay Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grain size coarsens upward through this unit as does the thickness of individual depositional sequences (4=10 feet), but coarsening upward trends within individual sequences are not aIways evident (Geehan et al 1986;Lawton et al 1988). Most commonly this unit is interpreted as braided stream deposits, but in some instances an alluvial fan interpretation has been proffered on the basis of recognized debris flow criteria (see Fig.…”
Section: Depositional History and Facies Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Grain size coarsens upward through this unit as does the thickness of individual depositional sequences (4=10 feet), but coarsening upward trends within individual sequences are not aIways evident (Geehan et al 1986;Lawton et al 1988). Most commonly this unit is interpreted as braided stream deposits, but in some instances an alluvial fan interpretation has been proffered on the basis of recognized debris flow criteria (see Fig.…”
Section: Depositional History and Facies Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This series of deposits contains individual fining-upward sequences up to 25-30 feet thick as well as thinner 2-10 foot thick sequences showing no distinct change in grain size vertically This series has been interpreted as braided stieam or mixed braided and meandering stream in origin (see Fig. 3-14) (Eckelmann et al 1976;Geehan et al 1986;Lawton et al 1988 Atkinson et al 1990) 3.2 MAJOR PLAYS iN ALASI(M these deposits contain abundant examples of continuous (i.e., extending over one or more well spaangs) low-permeability 6-inch-to-4-foot-thick siltstones or shales and other less areally extensive or discontinuous sikstones or shales interpreted as floodplain and abandoned channel deposits, respectively (Lawton et al 1988;Atkinson et aL 1990). Thinner more localized discontinuous shales represent drapes and other slack water deposits formed in the last waning 'stages of floods or in the lee of bedforms or fluvial bars.…”
Section: Depositional History and Facies Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are two causes for thin interlayer formation (Geehan et al, 1986;Xue, 1991;Mackey & Bridge, 1995). One is the interlayer at the stages of deposition including argillaceous interlayer and argillaceous cementation conglomerate interlayer, and the other is the interlayer in process of sediment diagenesis which is mainly calcareous cementation gritstone interlayer.…”
Section: Causes For Thin Interlayer Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%