2013
DOI: 10.3133/ofr20131096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geologic map of southwestern Sequoia National Park, Tulare County, California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There exist no quaternary faults or major geologic structures separating these catchments (Figure 7; California Geological Survey, 2023), further suggesting that the catchments have been subject to the same tectonic forcing. Both Dinkey Creek and the EFK are primarily underlain by granitic bedrock, with occasional outcrops of metamorphic bedrock (Bateman & Jones, 1972; Sisson & Moore, 2013), and both rivers feature abundance of waterfalls. Below we describe our methods for extracting river long profiles and identifying waterfalls and argue that, given the similar lithology and external forcing history between these catchments, differences in river profile morphology can potentially be explained by contrasting styles of waterfall erosion between these catchments.…”
Section: Comparison With Rivers In the Sierra Nevada Californiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist no quaternary faults or major geologic structures separating these catchments (Figure 7; California Geological Survey, 2023), further suggesting that the catchments have been subject to the same tectonic forcing. Both Dinkey Creek and the EFK are primarily underlain by granitic bedrock, with occasional outcrops of metamorphic bedrock (Bateman & Jones, 1972; Sisson & Moore, 2013), and both rivers feature abundance of waterfalls. Below we describe our methods for extracting river long profiles and identifying waterfalls and argue that, given the similar lithology and external forcing history between these catchments, differences in river profile morphology can potentially be explained by contrasting styles of waterfall erosion between these catchments.…”
Section: Comparison With Rivers In the Sierra Nevada Californiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mineral abbreviations following Whitney and Evans (2010). Unit abbreviations following Sisson and Moore (2013).…”
Section: Hydrothermal Fluid Flow At Empire Mountainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Empire Mountain skarn and its quartz diorite pluton outcrop in the northernmost extent of the pendant (Figures 1a and 1b). Over the time in which the pluton intruded during early Cretaceous subduction (∼109-105 Ma; Sisson & Moore, 2013), it released its magmatic fluid into the surrounding pendant rocks, formed massive skarn deposits consisting of garnetite and minor clinopyroxenite, and underwent remarkable hydrothermal alteration (D'Errico, 2011). Parts of the intrusion were hydrothermally altered to epidote and actinolite and are associated with the retrograde metamorphism (D'Errico, 2011).…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1) and is one of the many septa and screens representing the wall rock into which the Sierra Nevada batholith intruded. The Mineral King pendant is constructed from metaigneous volcanic (rhyolite to andesite) and intrusive (gabbro and granite) units, breccia sandstones, marbles, and marine sediment (Busby-Spera, 1983;Saleeby and Busby, 1993;Sisson and Moore, 2013). Many of these units were altered by the intrusion of fl uids and shearing (Bateman, 1992;D'Errico et al, 2012).…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%