2014
DOI: 10.3133/ofr20121024i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geologic framework for the national assessment of carbon dioxide storage resources: Alaska North Slope and Kandik Basin, Alaska

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most porosity in the Lisburne Group is secondary resulting from dissolution, karstification, and dolomitization (Wood and Armstrong, 1975;Jameson, 1994;Dumoulin and others, 2004). However, because secondary porosity development is at least partly related to beveling of the LCU, porosity tends to decrease south of Prudhoe Bay, especially into the area that encompasses the Lower Ellesmerian Deep SAU.…”
Section: Lower Ellesmerian Sau C50010103 and Lower Ellesmerian Deep Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most porosity in the Lisburne Group is secondary resulting from dissolution, karstification, and dolomitization (Wood and Armstrong, 1975;Jameson, 1994;Dumoulin and others, 2004). However, because secondary porosity development is at least partly related to beveling of the LCU, porosity tends to decrease south of Prudhoe Bay, especially into the area that encompasses the Lower Ellesmerian Deep SAU.…”
Section: Lower Ellesmerian Sau C50010103 and Lower Ellesmerian Deep Smentioning
confidence: 99%