2000
DOI: 10.1029/1999jb900353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geologic factors controlling patterns of small‐volume basaltic volcanism: Application to a volcanic hazards assessment at Yucca Mountain, Nevada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
96
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such features include the eruptive vent locations during the three epochs of CF activity in the past 15 kyr (each epoch is separately considered), and also the maximum fault displacement and the surface fractures density. Indeed the pre-existing faults/fractures have proved to be significantly correlated with the opening of new vents and typically represent a weakness element that may favor the magma ascent (Connor et al, 2000;Calais et al, 2008;Vitale and Isaia, 2014;Mazzarini et al, 2016;Bevilacqua et al, 2017;Tadini et al, 2017). However, several other factors including the fault angle, the magma pressure and the depth of interaction can be relevant too (Gaffney et al, 2007;Le Corvec et al, 2013), but are neglected in the present study.…”
Section: Spatial Probability Distribution Of Vent Openingmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Such features include the eruptive vent locations during the three epochs of CF activity in the past 15 kyr (each epoch is separately considered), and also the maximum fault displacement and the surface fractures density. Indeed the pre-existing faults/fractures have proved to be significantly correlated with the opening of new vents and typically represent a weakness element that may favor the magma ascent (Connor et al, 2000;Calais et al, 2008;Vitale and Isaia, 2014;Mazzarini et al, 2016;Bevilacqua et al, 2017;Tadini et al, 2017). However, several other factors including the fault angle, the magma pressure and the depth of interaction can be relevant too (Gaffney et al, 2007;Le Corvec et al, 2013), but are neglected in the present study.…”
Section: Spatial Probability Distribution Of Vent Openingmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Principal instrumen tation was a total-field cesium-vapor magne tometer. The resolution of the survey is nearly equivalent to ground magnetic surveys previously conducted locally in the region [Connor et al, 2000], but coverage over the survey area is uniform, permitting detection of volcanic and structural features that were not well resolved by previous aeromagnetic surveys.…”
Section: Expert Elicitationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Connor et al (2000) calculated an event rate of 1.3 x 10 -9 events/yr -1 per km 2 for the last 2.0 Ma for the western Great Basin. Application of this rate to a 2.5-km 2 (1-mi 2 ) facility area gives a volcanic disruption probability of 3.2 x 10 -9 events/yr -1…”
Section: Volcanismmentioning
confidence: 99%