2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12371-022-00777-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geoheritage Assessment with Entropy-Based WASPAS Approach: an Analysis on Karçal Mountains (Turkey)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimal weight difference criteria are SV7, PEU1, PEU5, PEU7, PEU10, PTU7, PTU9 and DR4. These results are consistent with studies Dede, 2023a-2023b;Dede and Zorlu, 2023;Zorlu et al, 2023) stating that the criteria used in geosite evaluations should be weighted according to the location and conditions of geosites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The minimal weight difference criteria are SV7, PEU1, PEU5, PEU7, PEU10, PTU7, PTU9 and DR4. These results are consistent with studies Dede, 2023a-2023b;Dede and Zorlu, 2023;Zorlu et al, 2023) stating that the criteria used in geosite evaluations should be weighted according to the location and conditions of geosites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…MCDM, a helpful approach to choosing the most suitable alternatives with more than one criterion, has been very popular recently and has wide application areas. However, studies using MCDM techniques in geosite assessment studies are limited (Datta, 2020;Dede and Zorlu, 2023;Jia et al, 2022;Mandal & Chakrabarty, 2021;Zorlu and Dede, 2023). For example, Zorlu and Dede (2023) stated that MCDM approaches would provide researchers with an essential insight into this subject area in their study in which they evaluated the geoheritage potentials of glacial landforms in the Yalnızçam Mountains (Turkey) using fuzzy SWARA-based EDAS methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advanced decision-making methods, including Fermatean fuzzy aggregation operators [67] and Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators [68], have been highlighted along with their applications and contributions to various fields, including the FMEA-QFD for risk assessment in distribution processes [69]. Dede and Zorlu [70] evaluated geoheritage by employing the entropy-based WASPAS model. They specifically focused on the Karcal Mountains, which are located in Turkey.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Dede and Zorlu [35] employed the entropy-based WASPAS approach to conduct a geoheritage assessment of the Karcal Mountains. While the method introduced by Dede and Zorlu [35] effectively determines the priority values of geological sites, enhancing the accuracy of decision-making results, this method cannot handle fuzzy and incomplete expert-provided information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Dede and Zorlu [35] employed the entropy-based WASPAS approach to conduct a geoheritage assessment of the Karcal Mountains. While the method introduced by Dede and Zorlu [35] effectively determines the priority values of geological sites, enhancing the accuracy of decision-making results, this method cannot handle fuzzy and incomplete expert-provided information. In response to the limitations of traditional Internet platform selection approaches, this study combined the FAHP approach and the WASPAS approach to handle Internet platform selection problems within an incomplete information environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%