knowledge. In re-reading Geography and geographers, I was struck by the extent to which the sections on the scientific and spatial turns, and also on the behavioral innovations, drew on US references, whereas that on systems theory cited British geographers (and, indeed, joint publication by human and physical geographers). In later editions, citations to feminist geography are mostly to British authors, emphasizing their theoretical and socialist approaches. My sense of the early US feminist geography is that it generally employed liberal perspectives and positivist empiricism. 2 In conclusion then, I have a new challenge for Ron Johnston whose career belies the book's comments on diminishing productivity as geographers become more senior. Beyond identifying the influences of liberal democratic societal settings in shaping a common 'Anglo-American' geography, will he take up a project that offers a contextual interpretation of differences between the Anglo and the American?
Janice Monk University of Arizona1. Reviews were not published in the Area at that time, nor could I locate one in Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2. Robyn Longhurst and Lynda Johnston (2005) have explored how New Zealand feminist geography had local, place-based conceptual emphases, for example, in early attention to multicultural themes.Hartshorne, R. 1939: The nature of geography.