Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1111/jors.12393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geography, productivity, and trade: Does selection explain why some locations are more productive than others?

Abstract: Two main hypotheses are usually put forward to explain the productivity advantages of larger cities: agglomeration economies and firm selection. Combes et al. (2012) propose an empirical approach to disentangle these two effects and find no impact of selection on local productivity differences. We theoretically show that selection effects do emerge when heterogeneous trade costs and the different spatial scale at which agglomeration and selection may work are properly taken into account. Our empirical findings… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(44 reference statements)
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, column (3) considers access to foreign market by restricting the sample to include only cities that are within 100 km from the nearest port. As found in Accetturo et al (2018), the results here show that better access to foreign markets indicates lower transportation costs and a stronger selection mechanism. This is because lower transportation costs mean better opportunity for profit, which increases the number of operating firms.…”
Section: Alternate Specifications and Sensitivity Checkssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, column (3) considers access to foreign market by restricting the sample to include only cities that are within 100 km from the nearest port. As found in Accetturo et al (2018), the results here show that better access to foreign markets indicates lower transportation costs and a stronger selection mechanism. This is because lower transportation costs mean better opportunity for profit, which increases the number of operating firms.…”
Section: Alternate Specifications and Sensitivity Checkssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In other country contexts, however, Arimoto et al. (2014) find evidence for both agglomeration and selection effects in Japan’s silk-reeling industry, while Accetturo et al. (2018) find only evidence of agglomeration economies in the case of Italy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As demonstrated in Combes et al (2012), when only agglomeration economies affect the productivity distributions in urban and non urban locations, the observed productivity densities in the two areas will be identical apart from a symmetric right shift in more agglomerated areas. According to Combes et al (2012) and Accetturo et al (2018), who extend the results of Melitz and Ottaviano (2008), stronger firm selection in large urban areas may also affect the productivity density, by resulting in a larger fraction of the lowest tail of the productivity distribution being truncated due to firms exit from the local market.…”
Section: The Productivity Distribution Of the Kibs Sector Firms In Urmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Using data on US household default on mortgages, Fuster et al (2018) find that the RDF model generates more accurate predictions than the logit model, although the improvement is minimal and accounts for about 1.2 percentage points of AuROC. The authors argue that most of these gains result from the sophisticated functional form of the RDF model, which captures the complex relationships connecting different variables to default outcomes with greater discriminatory power.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%