2004
DOI: 10.1191/0309132504ph500pr
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geography of development: development, civil society and inequality – social capital is (almost) dead?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of social capital goes back to the question of what holds societies together, and is used to explain why some societies develop better than others (Narayan and Pritchett, 1999;Serageldin and Grootaert, 2000). In this way the concept has found application in development studies (Narayan and Pritchett, 1999) and human geography (Radcliffe, 2004;Bohle, 2005), being relevant in the public discourse and for institutional policy, most prominently adopted by the World Bank (Holt, 2008;Krishna and Shrader, 1999;Dasgupta and Serageldin, 2000). Most recently, especially in the context of resource management and environmental (climate) change, social capital is considered to have explanatory power for how social networks and collective action can increase community resilience (Adger, 2003;Pelling, 2011;Jones and Clark, 2013).…”
Section: The Concept Of Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The concept of social capital goes back to the question of what holds societies together, and is used to explain why some societies develop better than others (Narayan and Pritchett, 1999;Serageldin and Grootaert, 2000). In this way the concept has found application in development studies (Narayan and Pritchett, 1999) and human geography (Radcliffe, 2004;Bohle, 2005), being relevant in the public discourse and for institutional policy, most prominently adopted by the World Bank (Holt, 2008;Krishna and Shrader, 1999;Dasgupta and Serageldin, 2000). Most recently, especially in the context of resource management and environmental (climate) change, social capital is considered to have explanatory power for how social networks and collective action can increase community resilience (Adger, 2003;Pelling, 2011;Jones and Clark, 2013).…”
Section: The Concept Of Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The lesson is that theories must specify the source of trust that effects obligation rather than simply identifying its presence. Radcliffe (2004) argues that such 'black box' views of social capital undertheorise social relations and she urges researchers to be more specific about the types of norms and networks that exist. In my study, as I will detail below, the UK migrant networks were largely elite-based, with an emphasis on building cultural capital in the context of racism.…”
Section: Diasporic Obligations and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SC is a quality of social networks (Holt 2008;Mohan & Mohan 2002;Radcliffe 2004;Coleman 1988;Glaeser, Laibson & Sacerdote 2002;Putnam 2001), and is built about the core idea that 'social networks have value' (Putman 2000, p19, emphasis added). As Westlund (2006, p.1) asserts, SC as a concept can be understood as emerging from the work of Bourdieu (1983) and Coleman (1988).…”
Section: The Conceptualization Of Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%