2013
DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geography and Biopolitics

Abstract: This article is the second of a two‐part exploration of the question of biopolitics and its importance to social geography. First, this paper examines two main threads—biopolitical geopolitics and vital geographies—to think about the different ways this analytical register has been applied. Next, we draw on our own research and that of others to suggest the possibilities for an affirmative biopolitics. Finally, we contend that geography is well‐placed to continue pushing the boundaries of biopolitical research… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This form of management has become predominantly focused on the production of a neoliberal subject concerned with the individual and the securing of personal wellbeing and social progress (Anderson 2015;Venn 2009). Biopolitics is used to designate the techniques and bureaucracies by which a population becomes targeted for forms of biopower (Anderson 2011;Foucault 2003;Pugh 2014;Rutherford and Rutherford 2013). The task of biopolitics is the administration of the whole social body and not the individual human organism, though the minutiae of individuals are regulated toward that collective end.…”
Section: Resilience Troubles: Biopower and The Subjectivities Of Resimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This form of management has become predominantly focused on the production of a neoliberal subject concerned with the individual and the securing of personal wellbeing and social progress (Anderson 2015;Venn 2009). Biopolitics is used to designate the techniques and bureaucracies by which a population becomes targeted for forms of biopower (Anderson 2011;Foucault 2003;Pugh 2014;Rutherford and Rutherford 2013). The task of biopolitics is the administration of the whole social body and not the individual human organism, though the minutiae of individuals are regulated toward that collective end.…”
Section: Resilience Troubles: Biopower and The Subjectivities Of Resimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial planning has a long-founded concern with the incorporation of local knowledge into technical rationalities (Friedmann 2010;Natarajan, 2017). In its participatory practice, planning suggests that the cognitions and emotions of place attachment can be normalised, and a semblance of equilibrium achieved between market logics and the pursuit of wellbeing (Rutherford & Rutherford 2013). This is a process of integration in which a way of being -the phenomenology of emplacement -is brought into dialogue with a way of knowing -the epistemology of planning (Allen & Crookes, 2009).…”
Section: Abstract Space and Planning Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Or, to express it briefly, how the making of land makes life. The last few decades in geography have seen biopolitics applied in an enormous variety of contexts (see Rutherford and Rutherford ). Although recent explorations into the biopolitics of non‐human life have begun to engage materiality in unique ways – including molecularisation (Braun ) and food (Nally ) – a geographical engagement with the biopolitics of geophysical transformation is still lacking.…”
Section: Geophysics Geopolitics and Hybriditymentioning
confidence: 99%