Geographie der Hybriden

Zierhofer, Wolfgang

doi:10.3112/erdkunde.1999.01.01

Cited by 44 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Sie lasst sich "als weitgehend instabille]" (Mrass 1981: 29) Folge und Nebenfolge sozialen Handelns beschreiben. Die Instabilitat der angeeigneten physischen Landschaft ist dabei eine doppelte: Sowohl auf der Ebene der physischen Manifestationen sozialen Handelns als auch auf der Ebene der gesellschaftlichen Landschaft ist sie ein "Nebeneinander von langfristigen und kurzfristigen, von latenten und manifesten Entwicklungen" (Bekesi 2007: 23 Die positivistische Landschaft lasst sich aus Sieht der Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie als ein .Faitiche" (Latour 2002) beschreiben: In Begriffen wie der .hlstonsch gewachsenen Kulturlandschaft" oder der "intakten Kulturlandschaften" oder auch einem Leitbild des Sukzessionismus verschmelzen sogenannte Fakten (franzosisch "fait") und Glauben ("Fetisch") miteinander und amalgamieren zu einem Handlungsauftrag der Erhaltung und Wiederherstellung oder der Vernatiirliehung angeeigneter physischer Landschaft (Weber 2007, Kiihne 2009 (Brown 1989, Hartz/Kuhne 2007 oder akteurs-netzwerk-theoretischen Interpretation (Latour 1996, Zierhofer 1999, PeIfini 2006 (Hartz/Kuhne 2007), aber auch der (durchaus konstruierten und projizierten) syrnbolischen Bedeutung der bestehenden und kunftigen Dinge als Hybriden des Kulturlichen und Nattirlichen (Latour 2001). Dabei misst sich der Erfolg einer auf konstruktivistischen Uberlegungen beruhenden Planung von Landschaft nicht an der Perfektion ihrer Zielerreichung, sondern an dem Grad der Integration der von der Planung Betroffenen -gemessen in den unterschiedlichen Dimensionen von Landschaft (Brown 1989 …”

Section: Positivistische Landschaftsbegriffe Und -Bewertungenunclassified

Grundzüge einer konstruktivistischen Landschaftstheorie und ihre Konsequenzen für die räumliche Planung

Kühne¹

2009

RuR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

KurzfassungDer Aufsatz basiert auf einer sozialkonstruktivistischen Landschaftstheorie. Landschaft wird dabei konstitutiv nicht als physisches Objekt verstanden, sondern als soziales Konstrukt, das sich physischer Objekte bedient. Landschaft stellt somit einen Hybriden aus individuellen und sozialen Vorstellungen, aber auch physischen Objekten dar. Eine weitere Dimension der Hybriditat ergibt sich daraus, dass Landschaft stets zugleich kulturlich als auch natiirlich ist. Fur den Umgang mit Landschaft in der raumlichen Planung bedeutet dies, Landschaft nicht allein auf physische Objekte zu reduzieren, sondern stets auch als variables soziales und individuelles Konstrukt zu denken. Dabei ist zur berucksichtigen, dass Landschaft nur in geringem Umfang planbar ist, da sie zumeist eine unintendierte Nebenfolge sozialer Entwicklung darstellt. Daruber hinaus wird die Forderung erhoben, die Bedurfnisse von Mindermachtigen starker in den Umgang mit Landschaft einzubeziehen. AbstractThe paper is based on the social constructivist landscape theory. In this setting, landscape is not constituted as a physical object but as a social construct that uses physical objects. Consequently, landscape can be described as a hybrid based on individual and social conceptions which includes also physical objects. Another dimension ofthe hybrid is the fact that landscape has cultural references as well as natural ones. Concerning the practice with landscape in the spatial planning these remarks imply that landscape could not reduced to its physical objects. It rather should be thought also as a social and individual construct. In this context has to be considered that landscape is barely able to be planned because it is usually an unintended side-effect ofsocial development. Furthermore the integration ofthe needs ofminors in power concerning the practice with landscape is demanded.

show abstract

Section: Positivistische Landschaftsbegriffe Und -Bewertungenunclassified

Grundzüge einer konstruktivistischen Landschaftstheorie und ihre Konsequenzen für die räumliche Planung

Kühne¹

2009

RuR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Triadic thought can thus be regarded as a new conceptual resource with great potential for more profound understandings of the material, dynamically hybrid, and immaterial dimensions of academic and wider mobilities in different historical and geographical contexts and across multiple axes of social difference. ii Triadic thought is represented, for example, by the sign/interpretant/object triad developed in semiotics (Latour 1993); by three-world-theories of Karl Popper (Zierhofer 1999) and Edward Soja (1996); and even by the Christian doctrine of the holy trinity, which conceptualizes one god in three forms (Jöns 2003, 148). The 'trinity of actants' also resembles in some ways the triad of material space (experienced space)/representations of space (conceptualized space)/spaces of representation (lived space) that Harvey (2005, 105) derived from Lefebvre's (1991) deliberations about the nature of space.…”

Section: Contributions and Outlookmentioning

confidence: 99%

Boundary-crossing academic mobilities in glocal knowledge economies: new research agendas based on triadic thought

Jöns

2018

Globalisation, Societies and Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This editorial introduction identifies a need for more multidimensional and collective theorisations of boundary-crossing academic mobilities in order to conceptualise this phenomenon, compare empirical findings, and identify new research perspectives. My suggestion is that triadic thought-or the thinking in three rather than two conceptual categories-overcomes some of the limitations that binary thought has imposed on social theory. By transforming the three conceptual dyads that frame this special issue on boundary-crossing academic mobilities, namely mobility/migration, students/academics, and local/global, into more differentiated relational triads, I argue that ordering and framing studies on academic and other mobilities through three-by-three matrices grounded in triadic thought helps to advance conceptual debate and unfold a wider research agenda in truly collective ways.

show abstract

“…Studies based on actor‐network theory (Callon ; Akrich & Latour ; Latour ) differ from the approaches introduced above in several underlying theoretical assumptions: in the assumption of a ‘flat’ ontology; in the performative understanding of reality as the enactment of multiple realities, which are historically, culturally and materially located; in the concept of actor and agency; and in the role of non‐humans as potential mediators in hybrid socio‐material processes. Their material semiotic understanding of relatedness (Law ; Mol ) has been employed in geography for about 15 years (Murdoch ; Whatmore ; Zierhofer ; Jöns 2006; Bærenholdt ), especially in non‐representational theory (Thrift ), assemblage geographies (Robbins & Marks ), and within the framework of urban studies (Farías & Bender ; McFarlane ). The notion of spatio‐temporal flows of action, in turn, is compatible with theories of practice (Everts et al ).…”

Section: Actor‐network Theory (Ant) and The Materiality Of Multi‐locamentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi‐Local Living – The Approaches of Rational Choice Theory, Sociology of Everyday Life and Actor‐Network Theory

Weiske

Petzold

Schad

2015

Tijd voor Econ & Soc Geog

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is no 'supra-theory', which might synthesise potential theoretical approaches for the study of multi-local living. Three selected theoretical perspectives are discussed: according to rational choice theory (RCT), multiple localisations represent just one of a number of choices, selected on the basis of individual preferences and given restrictions. Sociology of everyday life (SEL) addresses the reproduction of social life by focusing on practices of actors within the various social frameworks of multi-local everyday life. Actor-network theory (ANT) provides a 'toolkit' to 'de-scribe' the hybrid enactment of multi-local households. Materiality, processes, and multiplicity are emphasised. Each perspective reflects partial realities of the multiplicity of multi-local living. It is argued that the modelling of residential multi-locality pursued by the three approaches is highly productive if their results are compared with one another and interpreted as versions of reality differently shaped, which are partly congruent, partly incongruent due to incommensurable ontological and theoretical positions.Even though multi-local living is not a new phenomenon in most European countries, the multiplicity of practices of this organisation of life has gained a new dimension. Embedded in postmodern societies, multi-locality is mostly induced by processes such as individualisation, flexibilisation, acceleration, and mobilisation. Residential multi-locality may be explored against the background of diverse theory and by employing a variety of methods (see Weichhart 2015). In this contribution we aim to scrutinise the fruitfulness of three approaches: rational choice theory (RCT), sociology of everyday life (SEL), and actor-network theory (ANT) in order to gain greater insight into various aspects of the phenomenon of multi-local living. This selection, being one of many, should underpin current projects and narrow down specific research questions.These approaches have in common that they conceive multi-local living as a practice and a process. That is why they investigate how the practices evolve, how they can be maintained over longer periods, and how they are modified over time. The actors of multi-local living

show abstract

Geographie der Hybriden

Cited by 44 publications

References 0 publications

Grundzüge einer konstruktivistischen Landschaftstheorie und ihre Konsequenzen für die räumliche Planung

Grundzüge einer konstruktivistischen Landschaftstheorie und ihre Konsequenzen für die räumliche Planung

Boundary-crossing academic mobilities in glocal knowledge economies: new research agendas based on triadic thought

Multi‐Local Living – The Approaches of Rational Choice Theory, Sociology of Everyday Life and Actor‐Network Theory

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About