2002
DOI: 10.1136/sti.78.suppl_1.i139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographical variations in the epidemiology of bacterial sexually transmitted infections in Manitoba, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
65
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, studies in different settings have estimated different values for the Gini coefficient. One Canadian study calculated a value of 0.66 for Winnipeg, Manitoba (Elliott et al 2002), and one USAbased study calculated a value of 0.57 for King County, Washington (Kerani et al 2005). The different estimates obtained suggest that estimates of the Gini coefficient for an STI could be dependent on the methodology used, the context of the data, or both factors, and questions could therefore be raised about the accuracy and the validity of calibrating our model outputs against the Gini coefficient published by Monteiro and colleagues, which was based on data from Leeds from 1994 to 1995 (Monteiro et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, studies in different settings have estimated different values for the Gini coefficient. One Canadian study calculated a value of 0.66 for Winnipeg, Manitoba (Elliott et al 2002), and one USAbased study calculated a value of 0.57 for King County, Washington (Kerani et al 2005). The different estimates obtained suggest that estimates of the Gini coefficient for an STI could be dependent on the methodology used, the context of the data, or both factors, and questions could therefore be raised about the accuracy and the validity of calibrating our model outputs against the Gini coefficient published by Monteiro and colleagues, which was based on data from Leeds from 1994 to 1995 (Monteiro et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lorenz curves have been used to visualize and compare the distribution of STIs across geographically defined subpopulations (Elliott et al 2002;Kerani et al 2005;Monteiro et al 2005). In such studies, the Lorenz curves plot the cumulative proportion of incident infections (y-axis) against that of the population (x -axis), after ranking population subunits (e.g.…”
Section: Generating a Distribution Of High-activity Individuals Acrosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regional variation in these rates for each racial group is different than that noted for the combined rates of the two racial groups (Farley, 2006). From a structural perspective, higher STD rates are affected by the social, medical, and economic environment (Adimora et al, 2001;Aral & Holmes, 1999;Bunnell et al, 1999;Cohen et al, 2000;Elliott et al, 2002;Gunn, Fitzgerald, & Aral, 2000;St.Louis, Farley, & Aral, 1996). Given these three perspectives, it seems important when analyzing the association between social capital and STD rates at the state level to control for compositional, clustering, and structural determinants that affect exposure to and infection with STDs and that affect state variation in STD rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…States with higher STD rates have a larger number of persons who engage in risky behaviors associated with STD transmission (Bernstein et al, 2004;Jennings, Curriero, Celentano, & Ellen, 2005). From an infectious disease perspective and from a clustering perspective, STD rates in a given state are associated with similar STD rates in neighboring states and hence are not randomly distributed in space (Aral, Fullilove, Coutinho, & Van Den Hoek, 1992;Bernstein et al, 2004;Elliott et al, 2002;Fox et al, 1998;Jennings et al, 2005;Kerani, Handcock, Handsfield, & Holmes, 2005;Koumans et al, 2000;Webster, Rolfs, Nakashima, & Greenspan, 1991;Wylie, Cabral, & Jolly, 2005). Regional variation in rates of gonorrhea and syphilis, for example, continue to exist even when these rates are examined separately for Whites and for African-Americans (Farley, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is most well known as a method for representing inequality in income or wealth [31]. Recently, it has been applied to visualize the geographical distribution of several bacterial STIs at different levels [32][33][34][35] and over time [36]. In a mathematical modelling study, it has also been used as a method to describe the distribution of infections across certain subpopulations [37].…”
Section: Lorenz Curve and Gini Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%