2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographical variation of social calls and vocal discrimination in male Himalayan leaf-nosed bats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More broadly, geographic variation in calls has been documented in a wide array of taxa, spanning arthropod (e.g., Claridge et al, 1985;Lampe et al, 2014), amphibian (e.g., Pröhl et al, 2007;Jang et al, 2011;Velásquez et al, 2014), birds (e.g., Marler and Tamura, 1962;Irwin, 2000;Robin et al, 2011), and a few species of mammals (e.g., Mitani et al, 1999;Eiler and Banack, 2004;Amano et al, 2014), but rarely reported in bats though they have rich vocal repertoires for communication. The studies available on bats showed that only a few types of communication vocalizations were divergent across populations/groups (Boughman and Wilkinson, 1998;Esser and Schubert, 1998;Davidson and Wilkinson, 2002;Bohn et al, 2009;Sun et al, 2020). In this study, we found that the most frequent syllable types exhibited significant population divergence, suggesting that geographic variation could be commonly observed in the communication vocalizations of bats.…”
Section: Geographic Variation In Simple Syllablessupporting
confidence: 50%
“…More broadly, geographic variation in calls has been documented in a wide array of taxa, spanning arthropod (e.g., Claridge et al, 1985;Lampe et al, 2014), amphibian (e.g., Pröhl et al, 2007;Jang et al, 2011;Velásquez et al, 2014), birds (e.g., Marler and Tamura, 1962;Irwin, 2000;Robin et al, 2011), and a few species of mammals (e.g., Mitani et al, 1999;Eiler and Banack, 2004;Amano et al, 2014), but rarely reported in bats though they have rich vocal repertoires for communication. The studies available on bats showed that only a few types of communication vocalizations were divergent across populations/groups (Boughman and Wilkinson, 1998;Esser and Schubert, 1998;Davidson and Wilkinson, 2002;Bohn et al, 2009;Sun et al, 2020). In this study, we found that the most frequent syllable types exhibited significant population divergence, suggesting that geographic variation could be commonly observed in the communication vocalizations of bats.…”
Section: Geographic Variation In Simple Syllablessupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Each recording file was 60 s long. Previous studies have found that this species vocalizes most actively approximately 2 h before they leave the cave to nightly forage and during the early morning hours after they return to the cave from foraging (Lin et al, 2016;Sun et al, 2020). Therefore, recording sessions were scheduled from 19:30 in the evening to 8:30 on the next morning to include the active vocal period of the bats.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have suggested that using a local conspecific call is most appropriate (Hill et al, 2015 ; Schöner et al, 2010 ), whereas others suggest a foreign and/or novel sound is more appropriate (Hill & Greenaway, 2005 ; Lintott et al, 2014 ; Quackenbush et al, 2016 ). However, even within a single region, the calls of some species can show considerable geographic variation (Sun et al, 2020 ) and many other factors are likely to be relevant, including the background bat activity when a lure is deployed (Lewanzik et al, 2019 ). In some cases, using conspecific calls has been unsuccessful in attracting the target species, having instead attracted other bats (Lintott et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%