2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographical variation in song frequency and structure: the effects of vicariant isolation, habitat type and body size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
36
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the same negative correlation between body size and vocal pitch has also been found within species (e.g. Tubaro and Mahler 1998;Laiolo et al 2004;Koetz et al 2007;Geberzahn et al unpublished data). In addition to frequency parameters, call amplitude is thought to be an honest indicator of body size in insects and, thus, to play a crucial part in sexual selection in this taxon (Simmons 1988;Gray 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Moreover, the same negative correlation between body size and vocal pitch has also been found within species (e.g. Tubaro and Mahler 1998;Laiolo et al 2004;Koetz et al 2007;Geberzahn et al unpublished data). In addition to frequency parameters, call amplitude is thought to be an honest indicator of body size in insects and, thus, to play a crucial part in sexual selection in this taxon (Simmons 1988;Gray 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…We also examine how song structure changes with location. Species with wide geographical ranges are likely to experience cultural drift in song structure (Koetz et al 2007). We test whether song structure changes sharply at subspecies boundaries reflecting differentiation through vicariance, or changes gradually over space reflecting isolation by distance mechanisms (Koetz et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we conclude that maximum frequency of whole songs was the best indicator of body size in male warblers. However, an inverse relationship between body size and vocalization pitch has been described in a number of species (Smith & Harper 2004;Koetz et al 2007;Potvin 2013;Linhart & Fuchs 2015;Mason & Burns 2015). In these studies, low frequency was the best predictor of body size, Figure 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%