2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographical origin of individual breeders from gilthead sea bream (Sparus auratus) hatchery broodstocks inferred by microsatellite profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…; Launey et al . ; De Innocentiis et al ., and ; Alarcón et al ., 2004; Brown, Woolliams & McAndrew ; Borrell et al ., ). Although no information is available on the wild‐base population, we can suppose that the heterozygosity values did not change substantially since then.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…; Launey et al . ; De Innocentiis et al ., and ; Alarcón et al ., 2004; Brown, Woolliams & McAndrew ; Borrell et al ., ). Although no information is available on the wild‐base population, we can suppose that the heterozygosity values did not change substantially since then.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The accidental escapement of individuals from sea farms is observed worldwide (De Innocentiis et al 2005), but in the Mediterranean very scarce and limited information is available. A significant number of individuals escaped during 1999–2005 after the partial or total damage of cages due to invasion of large pelagic species or adverse weather conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common practice for farmers to use breeders of different geographic origin [35] might produce cultured seabream genetically very different from the local wild ones, as recently demonstrated by Alarcón et al [5]. Consequently, any accidental or deliberate introduction of hatchery samples in the wild represents a potential threat to the genetic integrity of natural populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%