Geographical distribution of fertility rates in 70 low-income, lower-middle-income, and upper-middle-income countries, 2010–16: a subnational analysis of cross-sectional surveys

Abstract

Background Understanding subnational variation in age-specific fertility rates (ASFRs) and total fertility rates (TFRs), and geographical clustering of high fertility and its determinants in low-income and middle-income countries, is increasingly needed for geographical targeting and prioritising of policy. We aimed to identify variation in fertility rates, to describe patterns of key selected fertility determinants in areas of high fertility.Methods We did a subnational analysis of ASFRs and TFRs from the most recent publicly available and nationally representative cross-sectional Demographic and Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys collected between 2010 and 2016 for 70 low-income, lower-middle-income, and upper-middle-income countries, across 932 administrative units. We assessed the degree of global spatial autocorrelation by using Moran's I statistic and did a spatial cluster analysis using the Getis-Ord Gi* local statistic to examine the geographical clustering of fertility and key selected fertility determinants. Descriptive analysis was used to investigate the distribution of ASFRs and of selected determinants in each cluster.Findings TFR varied from below replacement (2•1 children per women) in 36 of the 932 subnational regions (mainly located in India, Myanmar, Colombia, and Armenia), to rates of 8 and higher in 14 subnational regions, located in sub-Saharan Africa and Afghanistan. Areas with high-fertility clusters were mostly associated with areas of low prevalence of women with secondary or higher education, low use of contraception, and high unmet needs for family planning, although exceptions existed.Interpretation Substantial within-country variation in the distribution of fertility rates highlights the need for tailored programmes and strategies in high-fertility cluster areas to increase the use of contraception and access to secondary education, and to reduce unmet need for family planning.Funding Wellcome Trust, the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Global, Regional, and National Estimates of Nutritional Deficiency Burden among Reproductive Women from 2010 to 2019

“…Women are unable to make better health choices and nutritional decisions due to gender inequality, the low status of women, early marriage, unequal prenatal care [33], low education rates, low purchasing power [24], and unbalanced food supply. The high fertility rate, selective abortion, geographical concentration of the actual nutritional needs, low availability, abuse, low contraceptive use, and unmet needs for family planning are also causes of micronutrition deficiencies [34][35][36]. Heavy labor has led to excessive energy consumption.…”

Mapping and determinants of consumption of egg and/or flesh foods and zero vegetables or fruits among young children in SSA

“…So hot spot analysis examines where spatial clusters occur on the landscape by identifying areas with statistically significant clustering of relatively high values (hot spots) or relatively low values (cold spots). This measure indicates the presence or absence of significant spatial clustering, with the null hypothesis being that there is no difference in character between a unit and its spatial neighbors 53 .…”

Understanding the relationship between social determinants of health and maternal mortality

“…Evidence suggests women from Black, Asian and minority ethnic* backgrounds are more likely to be multiparous and therefore more prone to obstetric haemorrhage and worse maternal outcomes as a consequence. [23][24][25] However, in the UK, multiparity (having given birth two or more times) has not been shown to be associated with death in women aged over 35 years. 17…”