2014
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.01028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographical distribution, climatic variability and thermo‐tolerance of Chagas disease vectors

Abstract: Early View (EV): 1-EV geographic distribution limits and climatic conditions across species (Gaston 2000, Gaston andBlackburn 2000), several climate-based hypotheses have been proposed. Th ese include the climate variability hypothesis (CVH), which states that terrestrial organisms distributed in highly variable environments (e.g. high latitudes or altitudes) are adapted to withstand a broader range of climatic conditions than organisms in less variable environments (e.g. low latitudes or altitudes). Th erefor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
21
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The INLA approach used here is based also on a Bayesian setting and in principle provided similar results to those obtained with the MCMC approach, with the benefit of an easier implementation. Our resulting distribution maps differ of those reported by de la Vega et al (2015) [14], but most of the differences are explained by the different spatial resolution of their study. INLA and MCMC methods agreed in the shape and the extent of the spatial distribution in general for each species, but we observed slight differences particularly regarding the smoothness of the fitted random field fitted.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The INLA approach used here is based also on a Bayesian setting and in principle provided similar results to those obtained with the MCMC approach, with the benefit of an easier implementation. Our resulting distribution maps differ of those reported by de la Vega et al (2015) [14], but most of the differences are explained by the different spatial resolution of their study. INLA and MCMC methods agreed in the shape and the extent of the spatial distribution in general for each species, but we observed slight differences particularly regarding the smoothness of the fitted random field fitted.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, if temperatures rise above that thermal threshold, behavioral thermoregulation might not buffer its impact. Furthermore, upper lethal temperature (ULT) lies very close to CTmax (Chown & Nicolson, 2004;de la Vega, Medone, Ceccarelli, Rabinovich, & Schilman, 2015; de la Vega & Schilman, 2018). Thus, survival will rely on the existence of genetic variation for increased heat tolerance present in natural populations (Bush et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…1 km 2 ) resolution. Despite the scale of our analysis being regional (national coverage), we decided to use a fine grain of 30 00 spatial resolution because of the importance for the triatomines of local climatic conditions; de la Vega et al [57] have linked geographical distribution to physiological traits in the same two species analysed here, and WorldClim generated the climatic data through interpolation of average monthly climate data from weather stations also on a 30 arc-second resolution grid.…”
Section: (C) Environmental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%