Geographical and economic assessment of feedstock availability for biomass gasification in Burkina Faso

Barry, Fanta; Sawadogo, Marie; Ouédraogo, Igor W. K.; Traoré, Maiimouna Bologo; Dogot, Thomas

doi:10.1016/j.ecmx.2021.100163

Cited by 4 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The potential of the residues for energy recovery is assessed by considering several important parameters, namely the gross potential of the residues produced, the proportion to be left on the fields to ensure the sustainability of the farm (crop residues), and other competing uses. The calculation of biomass quantities can be done by determining the theoretical potential, the available potential, and the energy potential [ 4 , 39 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Agriculture in Burkina Faso generates a significant quantity of residues. In 2018, the theoretical potential of these residues was estimated at 4,342,127 tons of sorghum stalks, 2,016,664 tons of maize stalks, 1,092,356 tons of maize cobs, and 964,346 tons of cotton stalks “CT” [ 4 ]. The interest in these biomasses is because some are still very low exploited or valorized.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Rice husk “RH” in 2018, the national rice production was estimated at 160,949 tons [ 44 ]. This production generated a theoretical potential of 32,486 tons of rice husk, of which the mobilizable part for energy purposes was estimated at 6497 tons [ 4 ]. In 2020, the rice production potential increased to 201,734 tons [ 43 ], with an increase of more than 40,000 tons.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Various biomass resources available in Burkina are unevenly scattered throughout the country. Crop residues are mainly located in the major production areas, notably the Boucle du Mouhoun and Hauts-Bassins regions [ 4 ]. Agro-industrial residues are only available in major urban centers such as Ouagadougou and Bobo-Dioulasso.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A multicriteria approach for biomass availability assessment and selection for energy production in Burkina Faso: A hybrid AHP-TOPSIS approach

Zoma,

Sawadogo

2023

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A multicriteria approach for biomass availability assessment and selection for energy production in Burkina Faso: A hybrid AHP-TOPSIS approach

Zoma,

Sawadogo

2023

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…NPK microdose application shows very promising results for regions with low expected yields (Bielders & Gérard, 2015; Ouedraogo et al., 2020). Here, we hypothesize that the microdosing practice that combines biochar charged with mineral fertilizer and its application at low and realistic rates could maximize the biochar‐associated benefits, while being a realistic solution for small farmers that have to crop with very limited availability of biomass residues (Barry et al., 2021). However, the potential slow release performance of the nutrient‐charged biochar must be tested as it depends on soil and crop properties, as well as the nutrient carrier type (Boguta et al., 2019; Lawrencia et al., 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nutrient‐charged biochars increased nutrient‐use efficiency in a cotton–maize rotation in Burkina Faso

Saba

Cornélis

Sawadogo³

et al. 2023

Agronomy Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Soil nutrient depletion, low crop nutrient‐use efficiency, and limited access to fertilizers are serious issues leading to poor yield in agroecosystems of Burkina Faso. Blending biochars with organic or inorganic nutrients could slow down nutrient release, which can enhance fertilizer‐use efficiency. This study investigates whether charging biochar with nutrients and Acacia gum (Acacia senegal L.) coating can improve nutrient‐use efficiency in a cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)–maize (Zea mays L.) rotation system using low application rates (<5 t ha−1). The experiment was conducted in western Burkina Faso during three cropping seasons (2018–2020) with five treatments: T0, control; T1, conventional practice with compost and nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) application; T2, microdose (planting hole application) of NPK; T3. nutrient‐charged biochar activated with dissolved NPK; T4, nutrient‐charged biochar activated with dissolved NPK and coated with Acacia gum. Biochar‐based fertilizers significantly increased soil organic C content, as well as bioavailable P and calcium (Ca), without significantly improving crop yields, compared to conventional practice and microdose of NPK. When nutrient‐charged biochar was coated with Acacia gum, N‐use efficiency (NUE; N recovered in grain/N fertilized) was improved compared to uncoated nutrient‐charged biochar, although the difference was not significant. Despite no significant effects on crop yields during three cropping seasons, the use of coated biochar‐based fertilizer may be a technically effective solution to improve NUE in the long term in agroecosystems characterized by nutrient‐impoverished soils under a constraining South‐Sudanese climate.

show abstract

Did the COVID-19 pandemic disrupt food security in West African rural communities? Survey results from four regions of Senegal and Burkina Faso

Quillet,

Vandeplas,

Touré

et al. 2024

FACETS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Transboundary rural communities in West Africa play an important role in the exchange of goods, mainly food, among countries. The COVID-19 pandemic restricted these activities due to the closure of the borders. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in two regions of Senegal and Burkina Faso to examine the impacts of these restrictions on the pillars (availability, access, utilization, and stability) of food security in rural areas on men and women. The data set included 230 interviews, and they were analyzed through thematic content analysis. The results showed a decrease in agricultural production in all the communities due to mainly lack of labor force, and limited access to inputs, resulting in increased post-harvest losses. The disruption of trade and border and market closures affected rural families engaged in transboundary trade. Farmers experienced a sharp loss of household income leading to debts and decapitalization. Availability and diversity of and access to food was also heavily affected. Food security greatly varied among the communities and between countries. Perceptions also varied between men and women in terms of production, mobility, and food consumption. The restriction measures have triggered a spiral of effects and responses seriously impacting long-term food security in already highly vulnerable countries.

show abstract

Geographical and economic assessment of feedstock availability for biomass gasification in Burkina Faso

Cited by 4 publications

References 25 publications

A multicriteria approach for biomass availability assessment and selection for energy production in Burkina Faso: A hybrid AHP-TOPSIS approach

A multicriteria approach for biomass availability assessment and selection for energy production in Burkina Faso: A hybrid AHP-TOPSIS approach

Nutrient‐charged biochars increased nutrient‐use efficiency in a cotton–maize rotation in Burkina Faso

Did the COVID-19 pandemic disrupt food security in West African rural communities? Survey results from four regions of Senegal and Burkina Faso

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About