2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographical accessibility to the supply of antiophidic sera in Brazil: Timely access possibilities

Abstract: Snakebite accidents are considered category A neglected tropical diseases. Brazil stands out for snakebite accidents, mainly in the Amazon region. The best possible care after snakebite accidents is to obtain antiophidic sera on time. And the maximum ideal time to reach it is about 2 hours after an accident. Based on public health information and using a tool to analyze geographical accessibility, we evaluate the possibility of reaching Brazilian serum-providing health facilities from the relationship between … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These, in turn, are intimately related to the coverage, organization, and quality of the public health system. There is great heterogeneity in this scenario on a global basis ( Fan and Monteiro, 2018 ; Gutiérrez, 2012 ; Habib and Warrell, 2013 ; Oliveira et al, 2022 ; Potet et al, 2021 ), and therefore, analysis of antivenom availability and accessibility in specific regional and national contexts is a relevant task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These, in turn, are intimately related to the coverage, organization, and quality of the public health system. There is great heterogeneity in this scenario on a global basis ( Fan and Monteiro, 2018 ; Gutiérrez, 2012 ; Habib and Warrell, 2013 ; Oliveira et al, 2022 ; Potet et al, 2021 ), and therefore, analysis of antivenom availability and accessibility in specific regional and national contexts is a relevant task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As soluções consideradas estão relacionadas a distintas funcionalidades: A aplicação online desenvolvida foi testada com a realização de análises da acessibilidade geográfica a serviços de saúde. Foram refeitas a título de teste análises anteriormente publicadas a respeito da acessibilidade geográfica a serviços de atenção a traumas complexos (Oliveira et al, 2018), a municípios que dispunham de capacidade de atenção à saúde de alta complexidade no âmbito da COVID-19 (FIOCRUZ, 2020) e a estabelecimentos com oferta de soros antiofídicos (Oliveira et al, 2022). Nas repetições de análises realizadas anteriormente, foi possível através da instalação online, obter os mesmos resultados com menor tempo de processamento e sem impacto local (Figuras 3, 5 e 6).…”
Section: Desenvolvimentounclassified
“…Há na literatura diversos exemplos de estudos a respeito da acessibilidade geográfica a diversos serviços de saúde e baseados em diversas metodologias (Oliveira et al, 2004, Rocha et al, 2017, Ouma et al, 2018, Oliveira et al, 2022. A Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) disponibiliza em parceria com universidades europeias um software livre denominado ACCESSMOD (WHO, 2018), que permite a análise do tempo de deslocamento até unidades de saúde a partir das diversas questões que influenciam esse tempo como: distribuição da população, localização dos estabelecimentos, vias e meios de transporte (incluindo velocidades de deslocamento), relevo e uso da terra.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analyses of accessibility to healthcare are being conducted in many LMICs countries, including Nepal. 19 , 20 However, to our knowledge, only two studies have combined snakebite (risk or cases) and accessibility to healthcare in the population, 21 , 22 and none have done it continuously or taken uncertainty intervals (UI, a measure representing dispersion from an estimate) into account when calculating travel times. Similarly, when calculating snakebite vulnerability, previous studies have used surrogate values for risk (eg, species habitat suitability), and have also not considered UI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%