2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10211-015-0228-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographic variation in bird songs: examination of the effects of sympatric related species on the acoustic structure of songs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Grant and Grant ; Hamao et al. ). However, song functions in a variety of contexts and is subject to a variety of selection pressures, meaning that further divergence is not the only possible outcome of sympatry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Grant and Grant ; Hamao et al. ). However, song functions in a variety of contexts and is subject to a variety of selection pressures, meaning that further divergence is not the only possible outcome of sympatry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Rapid divergence in male songs and corresponding divergence of female song preferences in allopatry may create an important barrier to reproduction between closely related species coming into secondary contact (Price 2008). Further divergence when species come into secondary contact may result both from divergence due to ecological character displacement and/or direct selection on songs to differ to avoid costly interspecific interactions (Haavie et al 2004;Kirschel et al 2009;Grant and Grant 2010;Hamao et al 2015). However, song functions in a variety of contexts and is subject to a variety of selection pressures, meaning that further divergence is not the only possible outcome of sympatry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several examples demonstrating divergence in acoustic signals between closely-related species can be found in different sound-producing taxa such as arthropods23, anurans456, birds78 and mammals910. These differences would correspond to adaptations to different constraints and could help interspecies discrimination, preventing interbreeding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that H. r. tytleri greatly outnumbered H. r. rustica in villages where they both occurred (and were behaviourally dominant, based on local accounts), we might have expected rustica males to shift song parameters towards tytleri for mate attraction if homotypic mates are in short supply, or away from tytleri to minimize aggression. Such asymmetric patterns of character displacement have been shown in several bird taxa (Haavie et al, 2004;Halfwerk et al, 2016;Hamao, Sugita & Nishiumi, 2016). Instead, the lack of any song trait changes in the contact zone relative to flanking allopatric populations, together with evidence of very limited ongoing hybridization (Scordato et al, 2017), suggests that there has been no selection for increased divergence.…”
Section: Effect Of Subspecies Sympatry On Song Divergencementioning
confidence: 80%
“…(Amézquita et al, 2011;Pasch et al, 2017). Also, patterns of reproductive character displacement will depend on the costs of hybridization Convergence: birds (Secondi et al, 2003;Haavie et al, 2004;Qvarnström et al, 2006;Tobias & Seddon, 2009;Kenyon, Toews & Irwin, 2011) Divergence: birds (Haavie et al, 2004;Kirschel et al, 2009b;Halfwerk et al, 2016;Hamao et al, 2016), frogs (Blair, 1955;Höbel & Gerhardt, 2003;Hoskin et al, 2005;Lemmon, 2009) and insects (Marshall & Cooley, 2000;Jang & Gerhardt, 2006); review (Gerhardt, 2013) Listed examples are intended to be rigorous but not comprehensive.…”
Section: Ethical Notementioning
confidence: 99%