2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographic Patterns of Incidence of Ischemic Stroke and Acute Myocardial Infarction in Finland During 1991–2003

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The burden of these diseases is increasing in low-, moderate-, and high-income countries [1,2]. Worldwide, Finland and Japan have the highest and lowest myocardial infarction (MI) incidence rate, respectively [3][4][5]. More than 1/3 of the mortalities in Iran are due to CVD, so it is a serious challenge facing the country's healthcare system [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The burden of these diseases is increasing in low-, moderate-, and high-income countries [1,2]. Worldwide, Finland and Japan have the highest and lowest myocardial infarction (MI) incidence rate, respectively [3][4][5]. More than 1/3 of the mortalities in Iran are due to CVD, so it is a serious challenge facing the country's healthcare system [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a steep decline in Finnish North Karelia during recent decades, CVD still accounts for a large part of premature morbidity and deaths [1-3]. In North Karelia, serum cholesterol concentrations were extremely high in the 1970s [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional differences in cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality have been reported for a number of other countries, including the United Kingdom [32], the United States [19,33], Canada [14], Finland [20], Sweden [10], France [13,16], and across Europe [15]. Some of these studies have sought to simply identify and describe regional differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%