2017
DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000002265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographic Comparison of Women in Academic Obstetrics and Gynecology Department-Based Leadership Roles

Abstract: Objective To describe and compare geographic representation of women in obstetrics and gynecology department-based leadership roles across American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' districts (ACOG districts) and U.S. Census Bureau regions while accounting for the proportion of women practicing in each area. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional observational study. In order to more meaningfully quantify representation of women as leaders in ACOG districts and U.S. Census Bureau regions, we calcul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although none of the ratios reached a point of proportionate representation of graduated fellows, the proportion of women in both the PD and APD roles has increased substantially between the 2009 -2010 and 2020 -2021 academic years. The representation ratio of 0.57 is consistent with the national average for women fellowship leaders in OB/GYN subspecialties as compared to women in practice as demonstrated by Ricciotti, et al 7 Of note, holding the current number of programs and leadership positions constant, it would require 26 leadership positions to be vacated by men and filled by women in order to achieve a representation ratio of 1.0 for all leadership combined. As FMIGS does not impose any limit on the amount of time a person may hold any leadership position it would be difficult to estimate how many opportunities for advancement have been, or will be, created.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Although none of the ratios reached a point of proportionate representation of graduated fellows, the proportion of women in both the PD and APD roles has increased substantially between the 2009 -2010 and 2020 -2021 academic years. The representation ratio of 0.57 is consistent with the national average for women fellowship leaders in OB/GYN subspecialties as compared to women in practice as demonstrated by Ricciotti, et al 7 Of note, holding the current number of programs and leadership positions constant, it would require 26 leadership positions to be vacated by men and filled by women in order to achieve a representation ratio of 1.0 for all leadership combined. As FMIGS does not impose any limit on the amount of time a person may hold any leadership position it would be difficult to estimate how many opportunities for advancement have been, or will be, created.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Comparing to other specialties, men are in minority in OB/GYN but why is the "problem" different ? Despite a clear feminization of gynecologists, there would be proportionally more men in higher hierarchical positions 16 . The gender issue is different in gynecology-obstetrics as the patient population is exclusively female, whereas in orthopedic surgery, it is mixed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it has been shown that women remain underrepresented in departmental leadership roles and have a proclivity toward success in certain regions of the United States, these are factors that could have a potential impact on the representation of invited speakers at the SMFM and should be investigated in subsequent analyses. 15,16…”
Section: Research Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%