DOI: 10.47749/t/unicamp.2019.1126379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geografia e Inovação

Abstract: This thesis addresses the problem of disseminating broadcast packets in a multi-hop wireless ad hoc network. Specifically, it focuses on broadcasting protocols in which nodes make probabilistic decisions to forward packets. In connected multi-hop ad hoc networks, this type of protocol produces a broadcasting process that saves energy and bandwidth while offering a natural rotation of the subset of forwarders over time, yet it entails minimum overhead.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Probabilistic forwarding as a broadcast mechanism (see e.g., [4], [5], [6]) has been proposed in the literature as an alternative to flooding. Here, each node, on receiving a packet for the first time, either forwards it to all its onehop neighbours with probability p or takes no action with probability 1 − p. While this mechanism reduces the number of transmissions, reception of a packet by a network node is not guaranteed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probabilistic forwarding as a broadcast mechanism (see e.g., [4], [5], [6]) has been proposed in the literature as an alternative to flooding. Here, each node, on receiving a packet for the first time, either forwards it to all its onehop neighbours with probability p or takes no action with probability 1 − p. While this mechanism reduces the number of transmissions, reception of a packet by a network node is not guaranteed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probabilistic forwarding as a broadcast mechanism (see e.g., [4], [5], [6]) has been proposed in the literature as an alternative to flooding. Here, each node, on receiving a packet for the first time, either forwards it to all its onehop neighbours with probability p or takes no action with probability 1 − p. While this mechanism reduces the number of transmissions, reception of a packet by a network node is not guaranteed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probabilistic forwarding as a broadcast mechanism (see e.g., [7], [8], [9]) has been proposed in the literature as an alternative to flooding. Here, each node, on receiving a packet for the first time, either forwards it to all its onehop neighbours with probability p or takes no action with probability 1 − p. While this mechanism reduces the number of transmissions, reception of a packet by a network node is not guaranteed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%