2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geogenic manganese and iron in groundwater of Southeast Asia and Bangladesh – Machine learning spatial prediction modeling and comparison with arsenic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The “area of applicability” of the model was checked by comparing the values of the predictors of the entire study site with those of the training datasets (Meyer and Pebesma, 2021). The calculated dissimilarity index for all predicted pixels within the study area was found to be between 0 and 1: the range considered reliable for model prediction, as suggested by Podgorski et al (2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The “area of applicability” of the model was checked by comparing the values of the predictors of the entire study site with those of the training datasets (Meyer and Pebesma, 2021). The calculated dissimilarity index for all predicted pixels within the study area was found to be between 0 and 1: the range considered reliable for model prediction, as suggested by Podgorski et al (2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The calculated dissimilarity index for all predicted pixels within the study area was found to be between 0 and 1: the range considered reliable for model prediction, as suggested by Podgorski et al (2022).…”
Section: Modeled Probability Of As Exceedance and Model Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The “area of applicability” of the model was checked by comparing the values of the predictors of the entire study site with those of the training datasets . The calculated dissimilarity index for all predicted pixels within the study area was found to be between 0 and 1: the range considered reliable for model prediction, as suggested by Podgorski et al…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An emerging trend to address the subsurface-data scarcity problem is the use of machine-learning approaches. Such approaches have been used to infer subsurface structure, properties, and functioning, including stream water quality, groundwater chemistry and permeability that can potentially be used to infer CZ thickness (Erickson, Burnett, et al, 2021;Erickson, Elliott, et al, 2021;Ouedraogo et al, 2019;Podgorski et al, 2020Podgorski et al, , 2022Wen et al, 2021). Traditional methods such as random forest or generalized boosted regression models are being used (Bergen et al, 2019;Hare et al, 2021;Li et al, 2021) as well as deep-learning models with multiple layers of neural networks that automate pattern extraction (Zhi et al, 2021;Zhi, Ouyang, et al, 2023;Zhi, Klingler, et al, 2023).…”
Section: Leveraging Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence (Ai)mentioning
confidence: 99%