2012
DOI: 10.1029/2011jf002088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geoelectric observations of the degradation of nearshore submarine permafrost at Barrow (Alaskan Beaufort Sea)

Abstract: [1] Submarine permafrost degradation rates may be determined by a number of interacting processes, including rates of sea level rise and coastal erosion, sea bottom temperature and salinity regimes, geothermal heat flux and heat and mass diffusion within the sediment column. Observations of ice-bearing permafrost in shelf sediments are necessary in order to determine its spatial distribution and to quantify its degradation rate. We tested the use of direct current electrical resistivity to ice-bearing permafro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
63
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sediment drilling was conducted just offshore of the eastern coast of Buor Khaya Bay in the central Laptev Sea (71°25′20.3″N, 132°05′05.3″E; Figure c), southeast of the Lena Delta, in April–May 2012 [ Günther et al , ]. Following measurements similar to Overduin et al [], a geophysical site survey was carried out in 2011 [ Wetterich et al , ]. Based on this reconnaissance field work, we were assured of encountering ice‐bonded permafrost undergoing degradation at the drill site.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sediment drilling was conducted just offshore of the eastern coast of Buor Khaya Bay in the central Laptev Sea (71°25′20.3″N, 132°05′05.3″E; Figure c), southeast of the Lena Delta, in April–May 2012 [ Günther et al , ]. Following measurements similar to Overduin et al [], a geophysical site survey was carried out in 2011 [ Wetterich et al , ]. Based on this reconnaissance field work, we were assured of encountering ice‐bonded permafrost undergoing degradation at the drill site.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory measurements of saline silty and sandy sediment, similar in grain size distribution to those at Muostakh Island, show that ice is present in the sediment for bulk resistivities over 10 m , although the boundary between ice-free and ice-bonded sediment may not be sharply defined, so that resistivity changes gradually with depth. We consider that any sand-silt mixture that is ice-bonded with fresh porewater, as is the case here based on the porewater concentrations from the drilling samples, and consistent with previous observations of submarine permafrost in the Laptev Sea, will have a resistivity not lower than 10 m, and probably higher than 100 m. This assumption is also based on laboratory measurements of bulk resistivity as a function of temperature and salinity for marine sediments which show that the change in bulk sediment resistivity from an unfrozen seawater-saturated sediment to a frozen ice-saturated sediment corresponds to a jump in resistivity from less than 10 to over 100 m (Frolov, 1998;King et al, 1988;Overduin et al, 2012). Uncertainties in IBP depth estimated from resistivity profiles thus correspond to the depth range of the bulk sediment resistivity increase from 10 to 100 m. Mean submarine permafrost degradation rate was calculated as the quotient of the depth to IBP (z pf ) and the time of erosion (t 0 ; time of inundation).…”
Section: Electrical Resistivity and Time Of Inundationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the ocean, the two major sources of methane are ongoing biogenic production by microbes in anoxic sediment (Formolo, 2010;Reeburgh, 2007;Whiticar, 1999) and release of fossil methane from geological storage (summarized by Kvenvolden and Rogers, 2005;Saunois et al, 2016). Other sources include release from permafrost, river runoff, submarine groundwater discharge (Lecher et al, 2016;Overduin et al, 2012), and production from methylated substrates under aerobic conditions (Damm et al, 2010;Karl et al, 2008;Repeta et al, 2016). More than 90 % of the methane sourced in the seabed is oxidized within the sediment by anaerobic and aerobic oxidation (Barnes and Goldberg, 1976;Boetius and Wenzhöfer, 2013;Knittel and Boetius, 2009;Reeburgh, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%