Geoecological analysis of the impact of anthropogenic factors on outbreak of emergencies and their prediction

Abstract

The purpose of this study is geoecological analysis of the risk of natural fires and other emergencies of an ecological nature based on the location of high-risk objects in the territory of the Kharkiv region. The following tasks were solved in the work: calculation of the risk of an ecologically dangerous event depending on the density of placement of objects of high danger in the region; Creation of a chart-map on the level of danger of environmental threat in the districts of the region; the search for the dependence of the area of forest fires on the density of the population, the number of high risk facilities, etc. An analysis of the influence of anthropogenic factors on the occurrence of natural fires on the example of the Kharkiv region was carried out. Distribution of potential risk and population density in the studied area allows us to obtain quantitative estimation of social risk for the population. Excessive population density in some areas of the region is one of the factors that increase the material and social risk of the territory and population of the region from natural disasters and man-made disasters. We created mapping zoning of multi-level districts of the region, the risk of an emergency reflects the patterns of spatial structure of potential sources of emergency situations and allows to increase the readiness of the executive and authorized services to act in the event of sudden emergencies and to act for their prevention. Available data allowed us to estimate the density of the placement of potential sources of man-made emergency situations for all districts of the region, which gives us the right, with a certain degree of conditionality, to speak about the extent of the technogenic danger of the territory of the studied areas of the Kharkiv region. We propose to apply a complex factor taking into account the population density, density of placement of objects of high danger and the proportion of high risk objects in the area of the forestry organization in comparison with the total number of objects in the region. For the simultaneous evaluation of both natural and anthropogenic conditions of forest fires in the region, we propose to use the methodology of scoring on which they are evaluated in a four-point system, taking into account the five main characterizing indicators : population density; forest area; the density of high risk facilities; climatic and weather conditions; the share of high risk facilities. Comparison of information on the average number of fires on the lands of the forest fund of Kharkiv region over the past ten years with the results of our typology of the areas shows some correlation. The results of studies on the assessment of the risks of the occurrence of fires depending on natural and anthropogenic factors can be used for zoning similar areas and forecasting the fire situation.

[Retracted] Synergistic Effect Analysis of Ecological Protection and Environmental Law and Ecological Civil Code

“…On this basis, combined with “environmental pollution and ecological damage caused by human activities, thereby causing damage to other people's property or physical health,” Figure 5 is constructed on the basis of Figure 4 to analyze the consequences of environmental pollution and ecological damage and then pave the way for the research on how to obtain timely and efficient relief for ecological environmental damage in the second type below [ 14 , 15 ].…”

“…e types of damage to the ecological environment can be specifically divided into two types: one is the damage only in the ecological environment itself, that is, pure ecological environmental damage; the other is in addition to personal and property damage, plus damage to the ecological environment itself (Figure 4). On this basis, combined with "environmental pollution and ecological damage caused by human activities, thereby causing damage to other people's property or physical health," Figure 5 is constructed on the basis of Figure 4 to analyze the consequences of environmental pollution and ecological damage and then pave the way for the research on how to obtain timely and efficient relief for ecological environmental damage in the second type below [14,15].…”

Geoecological analysis of impacts of the use of plastic waste in road construction on the geological environment

“…points out to such an important disadvantage of using plastic in road building as release of hazardous substances in high temperature (Belotserkovskaya, 2020). In high temperature and when burned, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) emits dangerous carcinogenous dioxins, and also lead and cadmium -the most hazardous heavy metals -into the air (Buts, 2019, Buts, 2020. Even when heated insignificantly, PVC generates vinyl chloride, dioxins and other toxic compounds present in the additives (stabilizers, oils, plastifiers, fillers) used for PVC production.…”

Heavy Metals Content in Herpetobiontic Arthropoda on the Territory of Landfills of the Kharkіv City

“…Також вони спроможні імітувати та зменшувати в організмі вміст таких важливих елементів, як магній, кальцій тощо [13]. Не варто виключати і можливість передачі цих речовин в ході трофічних відносин до організму людини [14]. В останньому випадку велика концентрація важких металів в організмі може призводити до хронічних та навіть онкологічних захворювань.…”