2023
DOI: 10.1002/esp.5643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geodynamic control on Pleistocene coral reef development: Insights from northwest Sumba Island (Indonesia)

Abstract: The fossil record of Quaternary reef systems, as expressed in uplifted regions by sequences of stacked terraces, has been extensively used either to understand their morphodynamics or to unravel sea level variations. Yet, because these two aspects are intimately linked, Quaternary reef analysis is often underdetermined because the analysis often focuses on single sequences, along one‐dimensional profiles. Here, we take advantage of the lateral variations of coral reef sequences by documenting the morphological… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 74 publications
(206 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, uncertainties in Quaternary ESL variations are high (Figure 4;e.g., Caputo, 2007) and the choice of a specific ESL or RSL curve may greatly affect the model outcome (e.g., de Gelder et al, 2020). We chose five reconstructed ESL curves, that is, Waelbroeck et al (2002), Bintanja et al (2005), Rohling et al (2009), Grant et al (2014) and Spratt and Lisiecki (2016), for their different SL values during specific periods (e.g., MIS 9e, 7c, and 6a in Figure 4) and their use on the same type of terrace (e.g., de Gelder et al, 2023;Leclerc & Feuillet, 2019). The resulting best-fit simulations are named W02, B05, R09, G14 and S16 (Figure 4).…”
Section: Modelling Crt Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, uncertainties in Quaternary ESL variations are high (Figure 4;e.g., Caputo, 2007) and the choice of a specific ESL or RSL curve may greatly affect the model outcome (e.g., de Gelder et al, 2020). We chose five reconstructed ESL curves, that is, Waelbroeck et al (2002), Bintanja et al (2005), Rohling et al (2009), Grant et al (2014) and Spratt and Lisiecki (2016), for their different SL values during specific periods (e.g., MIS 9e, 7c, and 6a in Figure 4) and their use on the same type of terrace (e.g., de Gelder et al, 2023;Leclerc & Feuillet, 2019). The resulting best-fit simulations are named W02, B05, R09, G14 and S16 (Figure 4).…”
Section: Modelling Crt Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%