2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12371-022-00665-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geodiversity Supports Cultural Ecosystem Services: an Assessment Using Social Media

Abstract: Geodiversity is under threat from both anthropogenic activities and environmental change which therefore requires active management in the form of geoconservation to minimise future damage. As research on the role of geodiversity on ecosystem service (ES) provision has been limited, there is a need to improve our understanding of which aspects are most important to providing ES to better inform approaches to its conservation. Here, we focus on the cultural ES of hiking in Wales, UK. Harnessing big data from th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Silva et al (2021), one of the most encouraging actions to protect geodiversity and geoheritage is the creation of geopark areas where places and landscapes of international geological significance are managed through a holistic concept of protection, education, and sustainable development. In the case of geodiversity sites that do not have scientific value, they may reveal educational and/or tourist value, so they should also be the target of measures of inventory, conservation, promotion, and legal protection, with appropriate management plans and considered in territorial planning plans (Pereira et al 2019;Fox et al 2022).…”
Section: Cultural Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Silva et al (2021), one of the most encouraging actions to protect geodiversity and geoheritage is the creation of geopark areas where places and landscapes of international geological significance are managed through a holistic concept of protection, education, and sustainable development. In the case of geodiversity sites that do not have scientific value, they may reveal educational and/or tourist value, so they should also be the target of measures of inventory, conservation, promotion, and legal protection, with appropriate management plans and considered in territorial planning plans (Pereira et al 2019;Fox et al 2022).…”
Section: Cultural Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have used a range of predictor variables such as vegetation cover and distance from attractions. Moving forward, the outputs of visual magnitude analysis could be used to train models to identify areas of potential aesthetic services that incorporate geodiversity variables (Fox et al, 2022). In doing so park managers could create accessible routes to new areas that could alleviate pressures of over-usage from other areas of the park (Clemente et al, 2019).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from Flickr has previously been used to assess the relationship between geodiversity and cultural ecosystem services (Fox et al, 2022), geoconservation (Németh et al, 2021b), as well as aesthetic services (Figueroa-Alfaro and Tang, 2017;Van Berkel et al, 2018). However, to date, no such study exists that uses Flickr data to assess aesthetic services where geodiversity or geoconservation are intersected with the visual context the user engages with.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural changes in geodiversity are often slow processes, dating back to the early development of plate tectonics [ 1 ]. More recently, geodiversity is rapidly changing through a variety of human activities [ 2 , 3 ]. Such human-induced changes are often related to the (over) exploitation of geosystem services [ 4 , 5 ] provided by geodiversity, for example through the mining of sand, oil, gas and rare earths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%