2010
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2010.2051333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geodetically Accurate InSAR Data Processor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coherence loss results from temporal changes in surface scattering characteristics, changes in viewing geometry, and noise in the SAR data. Temporal coherence loss increases with the time span between the two SAR scenes, although coherence typically persists for individual seasons and even for several years in tundra regions for C-band and L-band SAR data [19,32,33]. We found generally good coherence in the interferograms with values greater than 0.5, which is consistent with our assumption that spurious effects such as radio frequency interference (RFI) and ionospheric Faraday rotation do not hinder the estimation of seasonal subsidence.…”
Section: Insar Techniquessupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Coherence loss results from temporal changes in surface scattering characteristics, changes in viewing geometry, and noise in the SAR data. Temporal coherence loss increases with the time span between the two SAR scenes, although coherence typically persists for individual seasons and even for several years in tundra regions for C-band and L-band SAR data [19,32,33]. We found generally good coherence in the interferograms with values greater than 0.5, which is consistent with our assumption that spurious effects such as radio frequency interference (RFI) and ionospheric Faraday rotation do not hinder the estimation of seasonal subsidence.…”
Section: Insar Techniquessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…All four of these anomalies occur in DTLBs, but we have not yet identified a common mechanism that can explain them. At SAC Basin, the spatial anomaly occurred in a slightly raised area of the DTLB away from the residual pond, indicating InSAR detected a seasonal variation in excess ground ice [32]. At Big Spot DTLB, the spatial anomaly occurs over standing water, hinting that the ReSALT retrieval algorithm may be detecting seasonal variations in water level.…”
Section: Overestimation Of Alt In Dtlbsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 39 images covering the two tiles were analyzed. Interferograms were formed using a geodetically accurate, motioncompensating InSAR processor (36). Elevation correction, negligible in this nearly flat landscape, was made using the SRTM 90-m DEM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1). The CSK interferograms were processed using the InSAR Scientific Computing Environment (ISCE) interferometric processing system (Zebker et al, 2010) by the Advanced Rapid Imaging and Analysis (ARIA) team at JPL-Caltech, in collaboration with the ASI and University of Basilicata. The interferogram was unwrapped using SNAPHU (Chen and Zebker, 2001) and masked using a signal coherence threshold.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%