2005
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/42/4/005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geodetic techniques for time and frequency comparisons using GPS phase and code measurements

Abstract: We review the development and status of GPS geodetic methods for high-precision global time and frequency comparisons. A comprehensive view is taken, including hardware effects in the transmitting satellites and tracking receiver stations, data analysis and interpretation, and comparisons with independent results. Other GPS techniques rely on single-frequency data and/or assume cancellation of most systematic errors using differences between simultaneous observations. By applying the full observation modelling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These files give the geocentric coordinates and clock values for each satellite tabulated at 15-minute intervals and are based on a weighted combination of analyses by several independent groups using dual-frequency pseudorange and carrier phase data from a globally distributed tracking network. For background, Ray and Senior (2005) have reviewed geodetic methods for GPS time and frequency comparisons. The IGS combination procedures were improved and the clock products were densified to 5-minute samples beginning in November 2000 (Kouba and Springer 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These files give the geocentric coordinates and clock values for each satellite tabulated at 15-minute intervals and are based on a weighted combination of analyses by several independent groups using dual-frequency pseudorange and carrier phase data from a globally distributed tracking network. For background, Ray and Senior (2005) have reviewed geodetic methods for GPS time and frequency comparisons. The IGS combination procedures were improved and the clock products were densified to 5-minute samples beginning in November 2000 (Kouba and Springer 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we can observe in the figure, the jumps are rarely mitigated and large jumps are transferred to the next in the case of using 2 successive jumps while most of the jumps are reduced more or less by using 3 successive jumps. The absolute synchronization error between two clocks is obtained from the code measurement data (Ray & Senior 2005). Therefore, it is expected that the jumps can be somewhat abated with the assistance of P3 data.…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the frequency difference of UTC(NIM) and SI-second, the Hydrogen maser we used for frequency measurement can be calibrated. After the calculation with the GPS precise point positioning (PPP) technique [26], we achieved a frequency transfer uncertainty of ~1×10 -14 with an averaging time of one day. Fig.…”
Section: Camentioning
confidence: 99%