2022
DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2022.2126799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geodetic observation of strain accumulation in the Banda Arc region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EWF segment has more seismicity than the WWF segment. Overall, seismicity in these two segments was low, consistent with a slip rate of 0.5 mm/yr based on recent geodetic observations byRahmadani et al (2022). Other seismotectonic sources in Region III originated from the local fault in the land, while the South Arm off the coast was most likely associated with the Selayar Fault Zone.We characterized Region IV (Figure6d) as the most complex region of the shallow part (< 60 km) in our study area.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The EWF segment has more seismicity than the WWF segment. Overall, seismicity in these two segments was low, consistent with a slip rate of 0.5 mm/yr based on recent geodetic observations byRahmadani et al (2022). Other seismotectonic sources in Region III originated from the local fault in the land, while the South Arm off the coast was most likely associated with the Selayar Fault Zone.We characterized Region IV (Figure6d) as the most complex region of the shallow part (< 60 km) in our study area.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…The two largest earthquakes along this fault are the 1980 (Mw 6.1) and 2011 (Mw 6.1) earthquakes, respectively. Statistically, the occurrence of a 6.1 Mw earthquake every ~30 years is reasonable, considering the 7 mm/yr slip rate of this fault (Rahmadani et al, 2022). The eastern edge of the Matano fault was interpreted to link with the arcuated Tolo thrust (Silver et al, 1983b;Hinschberger et al, 2005;Titu-eki & Hall, 2020).…”
Section: Shallow Part (<60 Km)mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We utilized a boundary based on seismicity separating the TIMO and SERA blocks to decrease the χ n 2 value and satisfy an F-test (Figure S5 and Table S3 of Supporting Information S1). This new boundary setting is consistent with the seismic zone defined by Rahmadani et al (2022). Koulali et al (2016) defined the boundary between the Western and Eastern Makassar Blocks (WMAK and EMAK, respectively) by combining the southern Palu, Masupu, and Walanae Faults, extending the latter offshore along the Selayar Trough, and then continuing this boundary in a southward direction until it connects with the Flores Back-arc Thrust.…”
Section: Preferred Best-fit Model Geometriessupporting
confidence: 68%