2016 IEEE 13th International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icsp.2016.7877846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geodetic coordinate calculation based on monocular vision on UAV platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the UAV detection tasks involve printed landmarks (Kim & Sukkarieh, 2003), smoke and fire (Campoy et al, 2009), civilian and industrial objects (Birk et al, 2011; Ellenberg et al, 2015; Jung et al, 2020; Ma et al, 2021; Medeiros et al, 2021; Pinto et al, 2021; Silva et al, 2020; Usenko et al, 2020; Yang, Li, et al, 2017), and scene changes (Nourani‐Vatani & Pradalier, 2010) detection. Other tasks contained three 3D reconstruction studies (Gee et al, 2016; Kaul et al, 2016; Wendel et al, 2012), one calculation of 3D geodetic coordinates of the target study (Li et al, 2016), and two performance analysis studies of SLAM methods (Diep et al, 2022; Hansen et al, 2022). Some researchers (Hyyppä et al, 2020) evaluated the methods of data collection in forests by handheld devices, UAV flying under the canopies, and UAV flying above the canopies, concluding that features collected by UAV flying under the canopies are more accurate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the UAV detection tasks involve printed landmarks (Kim & Sukkarieh, 2003), smoke and fire (Campoy et al, 2009), civilian and industrial objects (Birk et al, 2011; Ellenberg et al, 2015; Jung et al, 2020; Ma et al, 2021; Medeiros et al, 2021; Pinto et al, 2021; Silva et al, 2020; Usenko et al, 2020; Yang, Li, et al, 2017), and scene changes (Nourani‐Vatani & Pradalier, 2010) detection. Other tasks contained three 3D reconstruction studies (Gee et al, 2016; Kaul et al, 2016; Wendel et al, 2012), one calculation of 3D geodetic coordinates of the target study (Li et al, 2016), and two performance analysis studies of SLAM methods (Diep et al, 2022; Hansen et al, 2022). Some researchers (Hyyppä et al, 2020) evaluated the methods of data collection in forests by handheld devices, UAV flying under the canopies, and UAV flying above the canopies, concluding that features collected by UAV flying under the canopies are more accurate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weapon effectiveness simulation systems (WESS) is a modelling and simulation platform for CESS domain 18 . In general, WESS has two workflows from different perspectives: domain model development (DMD) for modellers and simulation application development (SAD) for users.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latest “second generation” picking robot from ABB of Sweden, the FlexPicker IRB360, offers the advantages of a larger payload, faster operation, and smaller footprint and with the help of simple and effective 2D vision, can quickly pick up items on a conveyor at speed of up to 2 times/second [ 13 ]. The robot vision system developed by the Finnish company RTS is successfully used in the production of naval propeller propellers, where the propeller blades are precisely ground according to CAD models by means of machine vision monitoring [ 14 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%