1991
DOI: 10.1029/90jb00834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geodesy by radio interferometry: Water vapor radiometry for estimation of the wet delay

Abstract: An important source of error in very‐long‐baseline interferometry (VLBI) estimates of baseline length is unmodeled variations of the refractivity of the neutral atmosphere along the propagation path of the radio signals. We present and discuss the method of using data from a water vapor radiometer (WVR) to correct for the propagation delay caused by atmospheric water vapor, the major cause of these variations. Data from different WVRs are compared with estimated propagation delays obtained by Kalman filtering … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
128
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(21 reference statements)
1
128
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming the hydrostatic equilibrium of the neutral atmosphere, the ZHD at a given GPS station can be modelled using the surface pressure (P s in hPa) and an estimation of the mean gravity (g m ) of the atmospheric column (Saastamoinen, 1972;Davis et al, 1985;Elgered et al, 1991), where g m depends on the latitude ϕ (in degrees) and the height h of the station above the Earth ellipsoid (in m):…”
Section: Ztd To Iwv Conversion Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming the hydrostatic equilibrium of the neutral atmosphere, the ZHD at a given GPS station can be modelled using the surface pressure (P s in hPa) and an estimation of the mean gravity (g m ) of the atmospheric column (Saastamoinen, 1972;Davis et al, 1985;Elgered et al, 1991), where g m depends on the latitude ϕ (in degrees) and the height h of the station above the Earth ellipsoid (in m):…”
Section: Ztd To Iwv Conversion Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most commonly used methods to obtain the ZHD is using the Saastamoinen formula, which is a function of surface pressure (Saastamoinen, 1972;Elgered et al, 1991;Niell et al, 2001). Davis et al (1985) pointed out that the uncertainty in the ZHD obtained from the Saatamoinen formula was 0.5 mm, if uncertainties in the physical constants and the calculation of the mean value of gravity were taken into consideration.…”
Section: Computation Of Zhd and Iwvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations (6) and (7), developed by Elgered et al (1991) based on the Saastamoinen formula, are adopted in this study to obtain the ZHD (in mm). These formulae have been widely used in many studies (Bevis et al, 1992;Bock and Doerflinger, 2001;Bokoye et al, 2003;Kleijer, 2004;Musa et al, 2011;Kumar et al, 2013;Norazmi et al, 2015).…”
Section: Computation Of Zhd and Iwvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the zenith total delay (ZTD) estimated from a GPS analysis represents the vertically integrated value of the refractive index of the atmosphere; it can be split into the zenith hydrostatic delay (ZHD) and the zenith wet delay (ZWD). The former is mainly driven by the neutral gas content of the atmosphere and can be accurately estimated using ground pressure measurements (Elgered et al 1991), while the latter is directly related to the vertically integrated water vapor contents (precipitable water vapor (PWV)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%