“…Although the tectonic model that the North China Craton was formed by the amalgamation between the Western Eastern Blocks of the NCC along the TransNorth China Orogen (TNCO) has been accepted by most scholars ( Fig. 1a; Diwu et al, 2014;Huang et al, 2012;Kusky et al, 2007;Yu et al, 2013;Zhao et al, 2001Zhao et al, , 2005, controversies still have been arised as to the formation of the TNCO: (1) some researchers suggested that the final amalgamation resulted from a westward subduction at ∼2.5 Ga (later modified to 2.3-2.2 Ga) (Kusky and Li, 2003;Kusky, 2011;Li and Kusky, 2007;Zhai and Liu, 2003); (2) some others proposed a eastward subduction with the final amalgamation at ∼1.85 Ga (Zhao et al, 2001(Zhao et al, , 2003(Zhao et al, , 2005; (3) the others suggested a westward subduction with two Paleoproterozoic Zhao et al, 2005); Abbreviations for metamorphic complexes: NH, Northern Hebei; XH, Xuanhua; HA, Huai'an; HS, Hengshan; FP, Fuping; WT, Wutai; LL, Lvliang; ZH, Zanhuang; ZT, Zhongtiao; DF, Dengfeng; TH, Taihua. (b) Geological distribution of the Taihua Complex in the southern NCC and the location of the Zhaiwa Mo deposits (after Li et al, 2014). on the above studies, meanwhile, most of these rocks studied are mainly distributed in the northern part of the TNCO, with studies of contemporary rocks in the southern part of the TNCO rare, which in turn limits our understanding of the tectonic evolution of the TNCO in the Palaeoproterozoic.…”