2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.08.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochronology and geochemistry of porphyritic intrusions in the Duolong porphyry and epithermal Cu-Au district, central Tibet: Implications for the genesis and exploration of porphyry copper deposits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies indicated small intermediate-felsic porphyritic intrusions and Cu-Au sulfide ores in Duolong ore district were from 120 to 110 Ma [45,46], which was accompanied by large-scale mineralization. In fact, aluminum hydroxyl (Al-OH) and magnesium hydroxyl (Mg-OH) were important prospecting indicators [36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies indicated small intermediate-felsic porphyritic intrusions and Cu-Au sulfide ores in Duolong ore district were from 120 to 110 Ma [45,46], which was accompanied by large-scale mineralization. In fact, aluminum hydroxyl (Al-OH) and magnesium hydroxyl (Mg-OH) were important prospecting indicators [36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Our model can be applied to optimizing ore prospecting target areas in the deposit. The metals and ore-forming fluids of Porphyry deposits in Duolong ore district are more likely to be released from magma chamber [45,46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While the closure time of the BNO is controversial, some studies suggest that the BNO may have closed during the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous through arc–arc ‘soft’ collision, most likely within 140–130 Ma (Zhu et al, 2016), and then entered the post‐collisional stage of the orogeny at approximately 110 Ma (Qu, Wang, Xin, Jiang, & Chen, 2012; Song et al, 2018). However, some studies have recommended that the BNO was still subducting northward during the Early Cretaceous, possibly within 106–125 Ma (Geng et al, 2016; Li et al, 2014; Sun et al, 2017; Xu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%