2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2017.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochronological and mineralogical constraints on mineralization of the Hetai goldfield in Guangdong Province, South China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the low fractionation factor of hydrogen isotopes between minerals and water at low temperatures (<330°C), the δD values of minerals were regarded as representing those of mineralizing fluids (Zhao & Zheng, ; Y. F. Zheng & Chen, ). The temperatures used in calculation are the peak values of fluid inclusion homogenization temperatures for intermediate (518.5 K) and late (480.5 K) substages, which is also consistent with the temperature from mineral geothermometers (Jiao, Deng, et al, ). The calculated δ 18 OH2normalO values of fluids coexisting with altered minerals of auriferous cataclastic ore (intermediate substage) range from 5.47‰ to 7.46‰ with a mean value of 6.73‰.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Because of the low fractionation factor of hydrogen isotopes between minerals and water at low temperatures (<330°C), the δD values of minerals were regarded as representing those of mineralizing fluids (Zhao & Zheng, ; Y. F. Zheng & Chen, ). The temperatures used in calculation are the peak values of fluid inclusion homogenization temperatures for intermediate (518.5 K) and late (480.5 K) substages, which is also consistent with the temperature from mineral geothermometers (Jiao, Deng, et al, ). The calculated δ 18 OH2normalO values of fluids coexisting with altered minerals of auriferous cataclastic ore (intermediate substage) range from 5.47‰ to 7.46‰ with a mean value of 6.73‰.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…197°C to 214°C; Table ) and chlorite thermometry (ca. 230°C to 260°C) from the hydrothermal intermediate substage (Jiao, Deng, et al, ), are lower than the argon closure temperature in mica (300°C−350°C; McDougall & Harrison, ), the present 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age can also be reliably interpreted as the timing of hydrothermal alteration and gold deposition for the Hetai goldfield. This new age is roughly in accordance with previously reported 152.5 ± 3.1 Ma of hydrothermal zircons U–Pb age (Zhai et al, ) and 157.1 ± 1.0 Ma of sericite 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age (C. Wang, Zhang, et al, ) of ore‐bearing rocks from the same deposit, which suggests that the Hetai goldfield formed during the Late Jurassic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous researchers have carried out many studies on the HGF, proposing different views and performing transdisciplinary studies on its stratigraphy, tectonic deformation, radioactive age as well as pressure‐temperature condition of its inclusions (He & Zhang, ; L. Li et al, 2000). For example, the origin of the HGF was reported to have resulted from the subduction of the Yunkai Massif beneath the Indosinian block during the Triassic (K. Zhang & Cai, ; Jiao, Wang, et al, ; Jiao, Deng, et al, ) or the oblique subduction of the Paleo‐Pacific Plate beneath the South China Block during the Early Jurassic (Cai, ); its ore‐forming age has been reported to be Caledonian, early Yanshanian, or middle‐later Yanshanian (J. Chen, ; C. Wang, Zhang, Wang, Qiu, & Gong, ). The process of ductile shear has been reported to have contributed greatly to gold mineralization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%