The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2017.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemistry, U-Pb geochronology and Lu-Hf isotope systematics of a suite of ferroan (A-type) granitoids from the CGGC: Evidence for Mesoproterozoic crustal extension in the east Indian shield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(c) The timing of metamorphism of the Sausar sediments between 1.06 and 0.93 Ga (Bhowmik et al, ; Stein et al, ; Chattopadhyay et al, ) also implies that the depositional age of the Sausar sediments can be best bracketed between 1.53 and 1.54 and 1.06 Ga or alternatively between 1.42 (timing of exhumation of granulites?) and 1.06 Ga. Based on the analysis presented above and drawing analogy with c. 1.45‐Ga extension tectonics in the adjoining Chhotanagpur Gneissic Complex (Mukherjee, Dey, Ibanez‐Mejia, et al, ), it has been argued here that opening up of the Sausar Basin is linked with a phase of Middle Proterozoic crustal extension as part of disintegration of the proto‐Greater Indian Landmass . The Sausar basal conglomerate‐sandstone unit near Balaghat area offers an excellent opportunity to undertake detrital zircon geochronology study to further test the validity of this interpretation.…”
Section: Disintegration Of Proto‐greater India Landmass and Mesoprotementioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(c) The timing of metamorphism of the Sausar sediments between 1.06 and 0.93 Ga (Bhowmik et al, ; Stein et al, ; Chattopadhyay et al, ) also implies that the depositional age of the Sausar sediments can be best bracketed between 1.53 and 1.54 and 1.06 Ga or alternatively between 1.42 (timing of exhumation of granulites?) and 1.06 Ga. Based on the analysis presented above and drawing analogy with c. 1.45‐Ga extension tectonics in the adjoining Chhotanagpur Gneissic Complex (Mukherjee, Dey, Ibanez‐Mejia, et al, ), it has been argued here that opening up of the Sausar Basin is linked with a phase of Middle Proterozoic crustal extension as part of disintegration of the proto‐Greater Indian Landmass . The Sausar basal conglomerate‐sandstone unit near Balaghat area offers an excellent opportunity to undertake detrital zircon geochronology study to further test the validity of this interpretation.…”
Section: Disintegration Of Proto‐greater India Landmass and Mesoprotementioning
confidence: 73%
“…However, the geological significance of these ages—either marking the timing of the BM 5 greenschist to lower amphibolite facies overprint or a late fluid‐mediated metamorphic recrystallization event—is not well understood at this stage. In a regional context, a pervasive high‐temperature, ferroan, A‐type granitoid magmatism has been dated at c. 1.45 Ga in the adjoining Chhotanagpur Gneissic Complex (Mukherjee, Dey, Ibanez‐Mejia, et al, ). The event has been interpreted to mark a phase of lithospheric extension, leading to the disintegration of the Columbia (Mukherjee, Dey, Ibanez‐Mejia, et al, ).…”
Section: Bhandara‐balaghat Granulite Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, several lines of observations reported by the existing studies raise the possibility that the CGGC experienced one or more phases of high‐grade metamorphism prior to ~1550 Ma. These are (a) the occurrences of older metasedimentary granulites as enclaves within the felsic orthogneiss that crystallized at ~1450 Ma (Mukherjee et al, ; Mukherjee, Dey, Ibanez‐Mejia, Sanyal, & Sengupta, ); (b) the intrusion of ~1550 Ma‐old anorthosites into an older metasedimentary granulitic crust (Chatterjee, Crowley, & Ghose, ); and (c) the presence of ultra‐high‐temperature/UHT metamorphic assemblages within few of the metasedimentary enclaves (reported by Sanyal & Sengupta, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%