2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2002.tb00850.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemistry of the ungrouped carbonaceous chondrite Tagish Lake, the anomalous CM chondrite Bells, and comparison with CI and CM chondrites

Abstract: Abstract-I have determined the composition via instrumental neutron activation analysis of a bulk pristine sample of the Tagish Lake carbonaceous chondrite fall, along with bulk samples of the CI chondrite Orgueil and of several CM chondrites. Tagish Lake has a mean of refractory lithophile element/Cr ratios like those of CM chondrites, and distinctly higher than the CI chondrite mean. Tagish Lake exhibits abundances of the moderately volatile lithophile elements Na and K that are slightly higher than those of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(45 reference statements)
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From its bulk oxygen isotopic composition, Clayton and Mayeda (2001) inferred that Tagish Lake was exposed to a high water/rock ratio, consistent with our observation of a relatively small anhydrous fraction. In CMs, this component is dominated by olivine (Grossman and Olsen 1974), so the smaller dense fraction should not necessarily be interpreted as a smaller refractory component; Tagish Lake is not depleted in bulk refractory trace elements relative to the CM chondrite average (Mittlefehldt 2002). Either Tagish Lake has a refractory inclusion content that is typical of CMs, or it originally had an abundance of refractory inclusions that was normal for a CM chondrite, and despite hydrous alteration, the elemental signature of this component was retained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From its bulk oxygen isotopic composition, Clayton and Mayeda (2001) inferred that Tagish Lake was exposed to a high water/rock ratio, consistent with our observation of a relatively small anhydrous fraction. In CMs, this component is dominated by olivine (Grossman and Olsen 1974), so the smaller dense fraction should not necessarily be interpreted as a smaller refractory component; Tagish Lake is not depleted in bulk refractory trace elements relative to the CM chondrite average (Mittlefehldt 2002). Either Tagish Lake has a refractory inclusion content that is typical of CMs, or it originally had an abundance of refractory inclusions that was normal for a CM chondrite, and despite hydrous alteration, the elemental signature of this component was retained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that considered oxygen isotopes (Clayton and Mayeda 2001;Leshin et al 2001), bulk organic carbon , bulk chemistry (Friedrich et al 2002), and organic compounds (Pizzarello and Huang 2002) concluded that it is different from both CMs and CIs. Based on its bulk density, chondrule and inclusion types, and general mineralogy, Zolensky et al (2002) concluded that Tagish Lake is distinct from the known CIs, CRs, and CMs and suggested that it is a new kind of type 2 carbonaceous chondrite, while studies of the sulfides (Bullock et al 2002) and bulk chemistry (Mittlefehldt 2002) showed ways in which Tagish Lake is similar to CMs. Thus, a good understanding of Tagish Lake has remained elusive, and classification of Tagish Lake remains somewhat ambiguous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bells is considered an anomalous brecciated CM chondrite. Its bulk oxygen isotope composition (Rowe et al, 1994), noble gas signatures (Zadnik, 1985) and chemical composition (Mittlefehldt, 2002) Rubin et al (2007) as 2.1, whereas Browning et al (1996) suggest that Bells is in fact a weakly altered CM chondrite, similar to Murchison (CM2.5). Besides looking at Maribo and Jbilet Winselwan to identify mineralogical, isotopic and structural changes during the earliest stages of alteration, we chose Bells to determine whether this anomalous chondrite accreted to the CM chondrite parent body or belongs to a different parent body.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the least altered CM chondrite Paris was found to have a bulk d 15 N value of +19.5‰ (Vinogradoff et al, 2017), on the upper end of CM chondrite values. Bells, often described as an anomalous CM chondrite (Kallemeyn, 1995;Mittlefehldt, 2002) . Therefore, we provide an alternative explanation for our samples and suggest that this discrepancy is the result of variations in the ionization efficiency of organic components with different N isotope signatures.…”
Section: Bellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Tagish Lake meteorite harbors (1) unusual petrologic and mineralogical characteristics in between those of CI1 and CM2 chondrites such as a fine-grained opaque matrix consisting mainly of phyllosilicates (intergrowth of serpentine and saponite), sulfides, and magnetites and within this matrix, the presence of altered CAIs and chondrules, isolated olivine grains, magnetite, carbonates, and Fe-Ni sulfides (Zolensky et al 2002); (2) mineralogical indications of high degree of aqueous alteration such as the presence of altered CAIs, and of carbonates ranging in composition from pure calcite (CaCO 3 ) to siderite (FeCO 3 ) and magnesite (MgCO 3 ), the last two endmembers not present in any other type of meteorites (Zolensky et al 2002); (3) a bulk refractory lithophile element abundances similar to the one of CM2 chondrites, while bulk moderately volatile and volatile element abundances are between those of CI1 chondrites and CM2 chondrites (Mittlefehldt 2002); (4) an oxygen isotopic composition near those of CI1 chondrites and some metamorphosed carbonaceous chondrites but different from either of these and from the O-isotopic field of the CM2 chondrites (Engrand et al 2001;Leshin et al 2001); and (5) a bulk rock carbon isotopic composition distinct from those of CI1 chondrites and CM2 chondrites, although the carbonates in Tagish Lake have carbon isotopic compositions similar to those of these two meteorite groups (Grady et al 2002). All these characteristics suggest that Tagish Lake is a new type of meteorite.…”
Section: Tagish Lakementioning
confidence: 99%