2014
DOI: 10.1134/s0016702914110081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemistry of the Osnitsk-Mikashevichy volcanoplutonic complex of the Ukrainian shield

Abstract: This paper addresses the geochemistry of intrusive (Osinitsk complex) and volcanic (Klesov Group) rocks of the Osnitsk-Mikashevichy volcanoplutonic belt (OMVPB) of the Ukrainian shield, which is an active continental margin existing approximately 1980-2000 Ma ago. The Osnitsk complex comprises a wide range of rocks, from ultrabasics to granitoids, and the Klesov Group is dominated by extrusive rocks of basaltic and rhyolitic compositions metamorphosed under epidote amphibolite facies conditions. The Sr-Nd-Hf i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The eastern part of the Prypyat horst belongs to the OMIB [38,39], which is considered to represent a Paleoproterozoic (ca. 2030-1980 Ma) active continental margin [40,41]. The OMIB comprises intrusive rocks ranging in composition from ultrabasics to granitoids (with granitoids being the predominant rock type) and extrusive rocks of basaltic and rhyolitic compositions metamorphosed under epidote-amphibolite facies conditions.…”
Section: Geological Setting 21 the Prypyat Horstmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The eastern part of the Prypyat horst belongs to the OMIB [38,39], which is considered to represent a Paleoproterozoic (ca. 2030-1980 Ma) active continental margin [40,41]. The OMIB comprises intrusive rocks ranging in composition from ultrabasics to granitoids (with granitoids being the predominant rock type) and extrusive rocks of basaltic and rhyolitic compositions metamorphosed under epidote-amphibolite facies conditions.…”
Section: Geological Setting 21 the Prypyat Horstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the OMIB and the Teteriv Belt represent juvenile Paleoproterozoic crust formed outboard of the Archean Dniester-Bouh Domain of the Ukrainian Shield, whereas Archean rock complexes are absent in the area. No Archean signature has been revealed in either the OMIB [41] or the Teteriv Belt [75,76]. The lower-crustal xenoliths of feldspar-rich garnet granulites and feldspar-poor eclogitic granulites that geochemically resemble mafic rocks of the OMIB have been also studied [77].…”
Section: The Possible Protolith Of the Eclogitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main lithotectonic units of the crystalline basement of Belarus are composed of mediumto high-grade metamorphic rocks of Paleoproterozoic age (Bogdanova et al, 2001;Claesson et al, 2001;Shumlyanskyy, 2014). They run NE-SW, parallel to the c. 1.8 Ga old tectonic suture between Sarmatia and Fennoscandia (Elming et al, 1998;Bogdanova et al, 2008;Lubnina et al, 2009) (Fig.…”
Section: Crystalline Basementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The northeastern boundary of the Sarmatia Craton with the Volga‐Uralia Craton is represented by the vast Volga–Don orogen (Figure 1), which is composed of juvenile Middle Palaeoproterozoic volcano‐sedimentary and plutonic complexes marking island arc (2.20–2.10 Ga), collisional (≈2.07 Ga), and post‐collisional (2.07–2.05 Ga; Bibikova et al, 2009; Savko, Samsonov, & Bazikov, 2011; Savko, Samsonov, Bazikov, & Kozlova, 2014; Savko, Samsonov, Larionov, Larionova, & Bazikov, 2014; Savko, Samsonov, Sal'nikova, Kotov, & Bazikov, 2015; Shchipansky, Samsonov, Petrova, & Larionova, 2007; Terentiev, Savko, & Santosh, 2016; Terentiev, Savko, & Santosh, 2017) tectonic settings (Figure 2). In the north and northwest, the Sarmatia Craton is bounded by the Osnitsk–Mikashevichi volcano‐plutonic belt, which is composed mainly of granite batholiths, diorites, and gabbro with ages in the range of 2.00–1.95 Ga, considered as an active margin of Sarmatia (Claesson et al, 2001; Shumlyanskyy, 2014).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%