2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.rgg.2014.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemistry of carbon dioxide mineral waters of the Choigan natural complex (northeastern Tuva)

Abstract: The abundance of various chemical elements (including trace, rare-earth, and radioactive) in the carbon dioxide mineral waters of the Choigan complex has been investigated. Three groups of waters are recognized according to the geochemical conditions and chemical composition: groundwaters of regional-jointing zone with oxidizing conditions; CO 2 -enriched groundwaters of regional-jointing zone with oxidizing conditions; and groundwaters of fault zones with reducing conditions. It is shown that water-rock inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spring waters have been grouped into (I) "Higher" temperature (T > 23 • C) thermal CO 2 -rich waters; (II) "Lower" temperature (T < 23 • C) thermal CO 2 -rich waters; and (III) shallow (non-thermal) groundwaters. Data from our group [26] for samples previously collected from the same area in 2011 are also included for comparison. Chemical compositional difference between waters sampled in 2011 [26] and 2013 (this study) were generally insignificant or small, with observed differences in TDS of typically just 10-200 mg/L, fluorine (0.1-0.9 mg/L) and iron (0.1-1 mg/L); however, larger differences in TDS (400-500 mg/L) were observed in several springs, perhaps reflecting changes in weather and hydrological conditions impacting on mixing between groundwaters of whatever type and rainwater [41].…”
Section: Hydrogeochemical Characteristics Of the Springsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The spring waters have been grouped into (I) "Higher" temperature (T > 23 • C) thermal CO 2 -rich waters; (II) "Lower" temperature (T < 23 • C) thermal CO 2 -rich waters; and (III) shallow (non-thermal) groundwaters. Data from our group [26] for samples previously collected from the same area in 2011 are also included for comparison. Chemical compositional difference between waters sampled in 2011 [26] and 2013 (this study) were generally insignificant or small, with observed differences in TDS of typically just 10-200 mg/L, fluorine (0.1-0.9 mg/L) and iron (0.1-1 mg/L); however, larger differences in TDS (400-500 mg/L) were observed in several springs, perhaps reflecting changes in weather and hydrological conditions impacting on mixing between groundwaters of whatever type and rainwater [41].…”
Section: Hydrogeochemical Characteristics Of the Springsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This iron may have been leached from biotite and pyroxenes contained in gneisses and crystalline schists in the subsurface. Piper diagram of spring water compositions in the study area (data for 2011 [26], 2013 this study). Open symbols are samples with SO4 > 0.4 meq/L.…”
Section: Hydrogeochemical Characteristics Of the Springsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations