2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2004.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemistry of a chert breccia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is typical of shallow sea cherts (Sharp et al, 2002;Kolodony et al, 2005), in agreement with interpretations previously drawn from field and petrographic observations of a marine origin .…”
Section: Quartzitessupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This value is typical of shallow sea cherts (Sharp et al, 2002;Kolodony et al, 2005), in agreement with interpretations previously drawn from field and petrographic observations of a marine origin .…”
Section: Quartzitessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These values are close to the ones determined by Kolodony et al (2005) for a chert breccia where the fragments of chert formed from seawater (d 18 O value around 32&) and the breccia matrix formed from fresh water (d 18 O value around 26&).…”
Section: O Data Obtained From In Situ Ion Microprobe Analysissupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This relationship between the two data sets supports the hypothesis that freshwater chert ␦ 18 O reliably reflects the large fluctuations in surface water ␦ 18 O expected in terrestrial environments. Two other isotopic studies of chert have also attributed low ␦ 18 O values to isotopically light meteroic water participation in chert diagenesis (Knauth, 1973;Kolodny et al, 2005), further supporting the idea that chert ␦ 18 O reflects variations in isotopic composition of water.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The spaces between the fragments are filled by siliceous plastic matrix cementing the fragments. The repeated cycles of in situ fragmentation followed by cementation of muddy siliceous sediment intruding from beneath the fragmented layer (Kolodny et al, 2005) formed the 5-10 m thick Brecciated Chert Unit (Soudry et al, 1985). The 11 B isotope content in the fragments (27-70 ppm) is higher than in the matrix (11-21 ppm).…”
Section: Lithofacies Of the Mishash Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, chert, dolostone and sandstone gradually replace this pelagic chalk toward the ancient coast to the southeast and blur the distinction of the Menuha-Mishash formational boundary, for which the name Say'yarim Formation was introduced (Bartov et al, 1972). These Upper Cretaceous cherts exhibit numerous sedimentary structures which incorporate a variety of microquartz occurrences of different origins and hence properties (e.g., Kolodny et al, 1965;Kolodny, 1967;Steinitz, 1970Steinitz, , 1981Steinitz, , 1985Kolodny et al, 2005) reflecting puzzling early and late diagenetic histories. Steinitz (1981) studied these chert structures and could not find a common explanation for their formation, regarding them as enigmatic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%