2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.07.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemistry and fluid characteristics of the Dalli porphyry Cu–Au deposit, Central Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Petrography and microthermometry of fluid inclusions trapped in hydrothermal veins provide insights into the nature of ore‐forming fluids and the formation of ore deposits (Lu, ; Roedder, , ). Three major types of fluid inclusions developed in the Xishadegai deposit, including two‐phase aqueous inclusions, CO 2 ‐H 2 O inclusions, and daughter mineral‐bearing inclusions, which are commonly identified in hydrothermal minerals of many porphyry deposits worldwide (Chen et al, ; Lecumberri‐Sanchez et al, ; Ni et al, , ; Pirajno, ; Wang, Zhou, et al, ; Wu, Chen, & Zhou, ; Zarasvandi et al, ), such as the Bajo de la Alumbrera Cu deposit, Argentina (Ulrich, Gunther, & Heinrich, ), the Red Mountain Cu deposit, Arizona (Lecumberri‐Sanchez et al, ), the Elatsite Cu‐Au deposit, Bulgaria (Stefanova et al, ), the Shuijiadian Cu deposit, China (Wang, Zhou, et al, ), and the Dalli porphyry Cu‐Au deposit, Central Iran (Zarasvandi et al, ). Containing abundant CO 2 ‐H 2 O inclusions is a remarkable feature at Xishadegai, whereas brines are typically less common.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Petrography and microthermometry of fluid inclusions trapped in hydrothermal veins provide insights into the nature of ore‐forming fluids and the formation of ore deposits (Lu, ; Roedder, , ). Three major types of fluid inclusions developed in the Xishadegai deposit, including two‐phase aqueous inclusions, CO 2 ‐H 2 O inclusions, and daughter mineral‐bearing inclusions, which are commonly identified in hydrothermal minerals of many porphyry deposits worldwide (Chen et al, ; Lecumberri‐Sanchez et al, ; Ni et al, , ; Pirajno, ; Wang, Zhou, et al, ; Wu, Chen, & Zhou, ; Zarasvandi et al, ), such as the Bajo de la Alumbrera Cu deposit, Argentina (Ulrich, Gunther, & Heinrich, ), the Red Mountain Cu deposit, Arizona (Lecumberri‐Sanchez et al, ), the Elatsite Cu‐Au deposit, Bulgaria (Stefanova et al, ), the Shuijiadian Cu deposit, China (Wang, Zhou, et al, ), and the Dalli porphyry Cu‐Au deposit, Central Iran (Zarasvandi et al, ). Containing abundant CO 2 ‐H 2 O inclusions is a remarkable feature at Xishadegai, whereas brines are typically less common.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase separation (immiscibility or boiling) is widely developed in geological systems, including immiscibility of basic and felsic magmas, magma and hydrothermal fluids, saline aqueous and CO 2 fluids, and boiling of aqueous fluids (Lecumberri‐Sanchez et al, ; Lu, ; Roedder, ; Ulrich et al, ; Wang, Zhou, et al, ; Zarasvandi et al, ). As an effective mechanism of ore deposition, it is involved in many magmatic‐related ore deposits, especially in porphyry–skarn polymetallic systems (Bodnar, ; Chi & Lu, ; Lu, , ; Ni et al, , , ; Roedder, ; Roedder & Bodnar, ; Stefanova et al, ; Wang, Zhang, et al, ; Zhang, Gu, Liu, et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16). It seems that magnetite crystallization during the formation of S-type FIs leads to the progressive reduction of sulphates Liang et al 2009;Zarasvandi et al 2015) and oversaturation of S 2− resulting in deposition of sulphide minerals during hydrothermal boiling synchronous with the formation of L-and V-type FIs. This event results from episodic hydraulic fracturing and healing caused by fluid boiling and mixing, the fluid system evolved toward low-temperature, low-salinity conditions, which only happened with L-type inclusions (e.g.…”
Section: B2 Sources Of the Ore-forming Fluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most im por tant por phyry de pos its in Iran in clude the ( Fig. 1): Sungun (Calagari, 2003), Dali (Zarasvandi et al, 2015), Aliabad (Zarasvandi et al, 2005), Sarcheshmeh (Aftabi and Atapour, 2010), Meiduk (Aftabi et al, 2008) and Shadan (Karimpour et al, 2014) de pos its. Some of the rec og nized epi ther mal Au de pos its of Iran are lo cated in the AMZ (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%