2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-6463-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemistry and environmental threats of soils surrounding an abandoned mercury mine

Abstract: The closure of mercury mining areas is generally associated with a release of Hg and other metals into the environment due to the abandonment of mining wastes. Because of their potential toxic properties, the mobilization of particulate and soluble metal species is of major concern. In the present study, the environmental risks posed by soils surrounding an abandoned mercury mining area in Valle del Azogue (Almeria, Spain) are assessed through the determination of physical-chemical parameters, the quantificati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the studied samples were considered to have a limited habitat function because more than 80% of the test organisms preferred the control soil instead of the test soils at the end of the assay (Hund-Rinke and Wiechering 2001). Results from terrestrial bioassays with earthworms were in agreement with previous studies that highlighted the higher sensitivity of sub-lethal endpoints in the ecotoxicological evaluation of contaminated soils (Hund-Rinke et al 2002;Davies et al 2003;Bori et al 2016). On the other hand, avoidance tests with the soil arthropod F. candida were not able to detect toxicity in any of the studied samples.…”
Section: E Co To XI Co Lo G Ica L Ev a Lu A Tio Nsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, the studied samples were considered to have a limited habitat function because more than 80% of the test organisms preferred the control soil instead of the test soils at the end of the assay (Hund-Rinke and Wiechering 2001). Results from terrestrial bioassays with earthworms were in agreement with previous studies that highlighted the higher sensitivity of sub-lethal endpoints in the ecotoxicological evaluation of contaminated soils (Hund-Rinke et al 2002;Davies et al 2003;Bori et al 2016). On the other hand, avoidance tests with the soil arthropod F. candida were not able to detect toxicity in any of the studied samples.…”
Section: E Co To XI Co Lo G Ica L Ev a Lu A Tio Nsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Between species, T. pratense was most sensitive to the contaminated soils, followed by B. rapa and L. perenne. The same sensitivity ranking was reported by Ramírez et al (2008) and Bori et al (2016) after exposing the same species to sewage sludge and metal-contaminated soils respectively. Regarding plant growth, all species were significantly inhibited in EM-1 and TOS whereas only L. perenne growth was inhibited in OS-6.…”
Section: E Co To XI Co Lo G Ica L Ev a Lu A Tio Nsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Knowledge of geochemical background values is also important for post-remediation assessment of soil quality. Soils of abandoned mining sites pose a serious environmental threat because of potential mobility of pollutants creating a risk of groundwater contamination and health hazards for local communities (Bori et al 2016;Pérez-Sirvent et al 2016). The study of soils in the post-mining areas should always include basic geologic, mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of the study area Romano et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they cannot detect toxic intermediary metabolites that increase soil toxicity (Haeseler et al 2001;Loibner et al 2003) nor provide information on bioavailability, synergic, and antagonistic phenomena (Juvonen et al 2000). On the other hand, ecotoxicological tests do integrate all soil-occurring phenomena and are therefore recommended for the ecological risk assessment of polluted soils Bori et al 2016) and as monitoring tools of hydrocarbon remediation (Salanitro et al 1997;Saterbak et al 1999;Mendonça and Picado 2002;Lors et al 2009;Megharaj et al 2011). In order to obtain useful information on potential ecological risks, such tests are usually applied in batteries that include species from different taxonomical groups and routes of exposure (Békaert et al 1999;Bispo et al 1999;Rila and Eisentraeger 2003;Fernandez et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%