2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2004.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemical test for branching decay of 176Lu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This topic has been recently reviewed in detail by Soderlund et al (2004) and Amelin and Davis (2005). Only a brief summary is needed here where we will consider the potential explanations provided so far for the k176 Lu conundrum:…”
Section: Previous Attempts To Explain the 176 Lu Decay Constant Conunmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This topic has been recently reviewed in detail by Soderlund et al (2004) and Amelin and Davis (2005). Only a brief summary is needed here where we will consider the potential explanations provided so far for the k176 Lu conundrum:…”
Section: Previous Attempts To Explain the 176 Lu Decay Constant Conunmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Amelin and Davis (2005) investigated the isotope composition of Yb in old terrestrial zircons. Even in relatively high-Lu/Yb samples, no 176 Yb excess could be detected and these authors concluded that 'branching decay can therefore be eliminated as the cause of the discrepancy in 176 Lu decay constant estimates.…”
Section: Previous Attempts To Explain the 176 Lu Decay Constant Conunmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precision and accuracy of the analyses are described in detail by Griffin et al (2002Griffin et al ( , 2000. The calculation of initial Hf-isotope values used the 176 Lu decay constant of 1.865×10 -11 (Amelin and Davis, 2005). Calculated model ages (T DM ) are based on the depleted mantle model described by Griffin et al (2000).…”
Section: In Situ Hf-isotope Analysis Of Zirconmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurements and data analysis motivated by this request are described in xx 2 and 3. In x 4 the present results are combined with an updated set of all relevant nuclear physics quantities as well as with the most recent information on the half-life (Amelin 2005;Amelin & Davis 2005) and solar system abundance (de Laeter & Bukilic 2006) of 176 Lu, for a comprehensive analysis of the s-process branching at A ¼ 176.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%